public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: libstdc++/3497: after build problem
@ 2001-07-02 13:01 pme
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pme @ 2001-07-02 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, isabet, nobody, pme

Synopsis: after build problem

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->pme
Responsible-Changed-By: pme
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jul  2 13:01:14 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    I changed it.
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: pme
State-Changed-When: Mon Jul  2 13:01:14 2001
State-Changed-Why:
    Thank you for your bug report.
    
    This is a binutils problem; there is a series of versions
    of binutils which don't work, and the missing __dso_handle
    symbol is the symptom.  You should either downgrade your
    binutils to an older version, or (preferably) upgrade to a
    newer version, such as 2.12.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=3497&database=gcc


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: libstdc++/3497: after build problem
@ 2001-07-02 13:26 Phil Edwards
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Phil Edwards @ 2001-07-02 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pme; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3497; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: pme@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, isabet@club-internet.fr,
        gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3497: after build problem
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:03:55 -0400

 On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 09:09:53PM +0100, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
 > On 2 Jul 2001 pme@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 > 
 > >     This is a binutils problem; there is a series of versions
 > >     of binutils which don't work, and the missing __dso_handle
 > >     symbol is the symptom.  You should either downgrade your
 > >     binutils to an older version, or (preferably) upgrade to a
 > >     newer version, such as 2.12.
 
 I meant 2.11.2 there, oops.
 
 > Closing a PR is hardly a complete fix to this problem - if some binutils
 > versions don't work, we should test for the bug in configure and refuse to
 > configure with broken binutils.  If the requirement for recent binutils is
 > platform-independent, we should also document it generally in
 > doc/install.texi and remove the documentation under specific targets
 > mentioning various old versions that are required.
 
 The .hidden bug has been showing up for more than a year on gcc-bugs;
 "upgrade your binutils" is what's always been said.  This particular
 problem is not a priority for me.
 
 
 Phil
 
 -- 
 Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
 new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
 which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
                                      - anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: libstdc++/3497: after build problem
@ 2001-07-02 13:16 Joseph S. Myers
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-07-02 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: pme; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3497; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: <pme@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,  <isabet@club-internet.fr>, 
     <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3497: after build problem
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 21:09:53 +0100 (BST)

 On 2 Jul 2001 pme@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 
 >     This is a binutils problem; there is a series of versions
 >     of binutils which don't work, and the missing __dso_handle
 >     symbol is the symptom.  You should either downgrade your
 >     binutils to an older version, or (preferably) upgrade to a
 >     newer version, such as 2.12.
 
 Closing a PR is hardly a complete fix to this problem - if some binutils
 versions don't work, we should test for the bug in configure and refuse to
 configure with broken binutils.  If the requirement for recent binutils is
 platform-independent, we should also document it generally in
 doc/install.texi and remove the documentation under specific targets
 mentioning various old versions that are required.
 
 -- 
 Joseph S. Myers
 jsm28@cam.ac.uk
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* libstdc++/3497: after build problem
@ 2001-06-30  6:16 isabet
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: isabet @ 2001-06-30  6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats

>Number:         3497
>Category:       libstdc++
>Synopsis:       after build problem
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          support
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Jun 30 06:16:01 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     isabet@club-internet.fr
>Release:        gcc-3.0.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
debian 2.2 + linux 2.4.5
>Description:
whne compiling some applications or when launching some
applications, I've the followinf message:
libstdc++: undefined symbol __dso_handle
There's no error during the compilation of gcc-3.0.0
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-07-02 13:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-07-02 13:01 libstdc++/3497: after build problem pme
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-02 13:26 Phil Edwards
2001-07-02 13:16 Joseph S. Myers
2001-06-30  6:16 isabet

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).