public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: libstdc++/3551: error in auto_ptr implementation
@ 2001-07-03 16:17 gdr
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: gdr @ 2001-07-03 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Laurent.Bonnaud, 101371-quiet, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, gdr, nobody, wichert

Synopsis: error in auto_ptr implementation

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->gdr
Responsible-Changed-By: gdr
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jul  3 16:17:46 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    Analysed.
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: gdr
State-Changed-When: Tue Jul  3 16:17:46 2001
State-Changed-Why:
    Not a bug.  The code shown is ill-formed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=3551&database=gcc


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: libstdc++/3551: error in auto_ptr implementation
@ 2001-07-03 16:16 Gabriel Dos Reis
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Dos Reis @ 2001-07-03 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3551; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel.Dos-Reis@cmla.ens-cachan.fr>
To: 101371-quiet@bugs.debian.org
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org,
   Matthias Klose <doko@klose.in-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3551: error in auto_ptr implementation
Date: 04 Jul 2001 01:13:39 +0200

 Matthias Klose <doko@klose.in-berlin.de> writes:
 
 | The code below does not compile with g++ 3.0, but it seems correct
 | judging by my C++ books.
 
 No serious up-to-date C++ book can claim the code below should work.
 
 |   list<auto_ptr<int> > lapi;
 
 That is incorrect:  You cannot put an auto_ptr<> in a standard
 container, by design.
 
 | This one is much more complicated.  I agree with Wichert that this
 | should work,
 
 No, the code is ill-formed.
 
 -- Gaby


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: libstdc++/3551: error in auto_ptr implementation
@ 2001-07-03 16:16 Ross Smith
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ross Smith @ 2001-07-03 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/3551; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Ross Smith <ross.s@ihug.co.nz>
To: 101371-quiet@bugs.debian.org
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/3551: error in auto_ptr implementation
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 11:13:54 +1200

 Matthias Klose wrote:
 > 
 > The code below does not compile with g++ 3.0, but it seems correct
 > judging by my C++ books.
 > 
 > Wichert.
 > 
 > #include <memory>
 > #include <list>
 > using namespace std;
 > int main(int, char**) {
 >   auto_ptr<int> api(new int(5));
 >   list<auto_ptr<int> > lapi;
 >   lapi.push_back(api);
 >   return 0;
 > }
 
 This is not supposed to work. STL containers of auto_ptr are illegal
 (23.1 para 3, container elements must be CopyConstructible and
 Assignable; auto_ptr is neither).
 
 -- 
 Ross Smith <ross.s@ihug.co.nz> The Internet Group, Auckland, New Zealand
 ========================================================================
 "Unix has always lurked provocatively in the background of the operating
 system wars, like the Russian Army."                  -- Neal Stephenson


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* libstdc++/3551: error in auto_ptr implementation
@ 2001-07-03 15:26 Matthias Klose
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Klose @ 2001-07-03 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats, debian-gcc

>Number:         3551
>Category:       libstdc++
>Synopsis:       error in auto_ptr implementation
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          rejects-legal
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Jul 03 15:26:01 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
>Release:        3.0 (Debian GNU/Linux)
>Organization:
The Debian project
>Environment:
System: Debian GNU/Linux (testing/unstable)
Architecture: i686
	
host: i386-linux
build: i386-linux
target: i386-linux
configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --prefix=/usr --infodir=/share/info --mandir=/share/man --enable-shared --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --disable-checking --enable-threads=posix --enable-java-gc=boehm --with-cpp-install-dir=bin --enable-objc-gc i386-linux
>Description:
[ Reported to the Debian BTS as report #101371.
  Please CC 101371-quiet@bugs.debian.org on replies.
  Log of report can be found at http://bugs.debian.org/101371 ]
 	
The code below does not compile with g++ 3.0, but it seems correct
judging by my C++ books.

Wichert.

#include <memory>
#include <list>
using namespace std;
int main(int, char**) {
  auto_ptr<int> api(new int(5));
  list<auto_ptr<int> > lapi;
  lapi.push_back(api);

  return 0;
}

[Comment by Laurent Bonnaud <Laurent.Bonnaud@inpg.fr>:]

This one is much more complicated.  I agree with Wichert that this
should work, but this is much more involved.  I could not think about
an easy fix.

If you look at /usr/include/g++-v3/bits/std_memory.h, you'll see this
comment that lacks precision:

  // According to the C++ standard, these conversions are required.  Most
  // present-day compilers, however, do not enforce that requirement---and,
  // in fact, most present-day compilers do not support the language
  // features that these conversions rely on.

The methods it refers too are crucial in making this testcase work.  So
the real question is: does g++ 3.0 support the necessary language
features ?

>How-To-Repeat:
	
>Fix:
	
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-07-03 16:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-07-03 16:17 libstdc++/3551: error in auto_ptr implementation gdr
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-03 16:16 Gabriel Dos Reis
2001-07-03 16:16 Ross Smith
2001-07-03 15:26 Matthias Klose

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).