Re: c/2404

Re: c/2404

[Richard Earnshaw]

The following reply was made to PR c/2404; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, bkohlen@intrinsyc.com,
        rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
        nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/2404
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:00:21 +0100

 The patch does not appear to have been applied to the mainline.  Has it
 been fixed another way?  If not, then this case should not have been
 closed.
 
 R.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2404&database=gcc
 
 --

Re: c/2404

[Philip Blundell]

The following reply was made to PR c/2404; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, bkohlen@intrinsyc.com,
    rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
    nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/2404 
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 17:18:52 +0100

 --==_Exmh_-1951321184P
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 >The patch does not appear to have been applied to the mainline.  Has it
 >been fixed another way?  If not, then this case should not have been
 >closed.
 
 I think Nick fixed it with a different patch.
 
 p.
 
 
 --==_Exmh_-1951321184P
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian)
 
 iD8DBQE7d/3sVTLPJe9CT30RAjXeAKDRNKWXi7BNTo89b0T4vWdDqhncZQCgmsdf
 UNFbiMFKCSbIgTyUI5SGA3Y=
 =SL/H
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --==_Exmh_-1951321184P--