Re: libstdc++/4168 is not a bug

Re: libstdc++/4168 is not a bug

[Philip Martin]

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/4168; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Philip Martin <philip_martin@ntlworld.com>
To: dominik.strasser@mchp.siemens.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: libstdc++/4168 is not a bug
Date: 30 Aug 2001 20:47:36 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=4168&database=gcc
 
 This is not a bug, both versions of operator() are required. This is
 resolution of issue 109. See
 
 http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#109
 
 To get your sample code to work change
 
   struct CmpStrInt : public binary_function<const StrInt, const string, bool>
   {
     bool operator()(const StrInt& l, const string& r) const;
   }
 
 to
 
   struct CmpStrInt : public binary_function<StrInt, string, bool>
   {
     bool operator()(const StrInt& l, const string& r) const;
   }
 
 Philip