Re: web/4599: gnats suggests sending to addresses that are restricted

Re: web/4599: gnats suggests sending to addresses that are restricted

[gerald]

Synopsis: gnats suggests sending to addresses that are restricted

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: gerald
State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 13 08:19:24 2001
State-Changed-Why:
    This is a duplicate of 4786. Is the latter has a bit more
    technical information, I close the earlier report.
    
    (I believe part of the problem has been fixed by now, in that
    the address should not bounce any longer.)

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=4599&database=gcc

Re: web/4599: gnats suggests sending to addresses that are restricted

[gerald]

The following reply was made to PR web/4599; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: gerald@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  overseers@gcc.gnu.org, sandra@wambold.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: web/4599: gnats suggests sending to addresses that are restricted
Date: 13 Nov 2001 16:19:25 -0000

 Synopsis: gnats suggests sending to addresses that are restricted
 
 State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
 State-Changed-By: gerald
 State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 13 08:19:24 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     This is a duplicate of 4786. Is the latter has a bit more
     technical information, I close the earlier report.
     
     (I believe part of the problem has been fixed by now, in that
     the address should not bounce any longer.)
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=4599&database=gcc

Re: web/4599: gnats suggests sending to addresses that are restricted

[gerald]

Synopsis: gnats suggests sending to addresses that are restricted

Responsible-Changed-From-To: gerald->overseers
Responsible-Changed-By: gerald
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Oct 18 00:05:42 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    Transfer to overseers.
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: gerald
State-Changed-When: Thu Oct 18 00:05:42 2001
State-Changed-Why:
    Analysed by Joseph.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=4599&database=gcc

Re: web/4599: gnats suggests sending to addresses that are restricted

[Joseph S. Myers]

The following reply was made to PR web/4599; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: <sandra@wambold.com>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,  <gerald@gcc.gnu.org>,  <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: web/4599: gnats suggests sending to addresses that are restricted
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 01:37:41 +0100 (BST)

 On 17 Oct 2001 sandra@wambold.com wrote:
 
 > So, if you're not supposed to send to gcc-prs, gnats shouldn't suggest
 > doing so.
 
 The correct address for replies is gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org.  I previously
 pointed out to overseers
 <URL: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2001-q3/msg00573.html > that a
 previously working configuration including this in status change messages
 had broken and this was causing relevant information about bug reports to
 be missing from GNATS, but there were no replies.
 
 -- 
 Joseph S. Myers
 jsm28@cam.ac.uk
 

web/4599: gnats suggests sending to addresses that are restricted

[sandra]

>Number:         4599
>Category:       web
>Synopsis:       gnats suggests sending to addresses that are restricted
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    gerald
>State:          open
>Class:          support
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Oct 17 15:36:02 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     sandra@wambold.com
>Release:        n/a
>Organization:
>Environment:
n/a
>Description:
I replied to a gcc gnat report using the suggested addresses, including gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org and got the
following message:


Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sourceware.cygnus.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>:
Sender: wambold@pobox.com
This mailing list is not for general discussions.  Please resend your mail note to a more appropriate list.

So, if you're not supposed to send to gcc-prs, gnats shouldn't suggest doing so.
>How-To-Repeat:
Reply to a report using the address provided.
>Fix:
Take out gcc-prs from list if it's not to be used OR
allow postings to gcc-prs.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: