public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: pb@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: target/2309: [ARM] SUBREG in memory reference
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 02:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020123102602.2313.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR target/2309; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Cc: bernds@redhat.com, richard.earnshaw@arm.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/2309: [ARM] SUBREG in memory reference 
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 10:23:17 +0000

 > Does anybody know what the status of this is now?
 > 
 > I don't seem to have a copy of the original testcase any more, and the
 > one in GNATS appears to be corrupt, so I can't easily test whether the
 > bug still happens.  (Even if I did have that testcase, I guess there's a
 > good chance that it would no longer generate the problematic RTL in any
 > case
 > 
 > From a quick look at GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS in arm.h from the 3.0
 > branch, it seems to me that it's still not prepared to handle SUBREGs in
 > memory expressions.
 > 
 > 
 
 I have the original post as sent out by gnats, but I can't even extract 
 the testcase from that.  So I think it must either have been corrupted 
 right up front, or have been a bad attachment in the first place.
 
 However, sleuthing shows that the problem may have been fixed:
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-04/msg00131.html
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/1999-06/msg00419.html
 
 R.
 


             reply	other threads:[~2002-01-23 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-23  2:26 Richard Earnshaw [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-17 10:46 Philip Blundell
2003-05-17 10:42 pb
2003-05-17  9:56 Dara Hazeghi
2002-01-23  2:46 Phil Blundell
2002-01-22 13:16 Philip Blundell
2002-01-22 12:37 pb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020123102602.2313.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=rearnsha@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=pb@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).