Re: c++/3747: ambiguity between `T operator[](unsigned)` and `T* operator`

Re: c++/3747: ambiguity between `T operator[](unsigned)` and `T* operator`

[jason]

Synopsis: ambiguity between `T operator[](unsigned)` and `T* operator`

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: jason
State-Changed-When: Fri Feb  1 04:26:25 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Not a bug, as explained by Hyman Rosen.  However, as a g++ extension this code will compile with -fpermissive.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3747

Re: c++/3747 ambiguity between `T operator[](unsigned)` and `T* operator`

[Billinghurst, David (CRTS)]

The following reply was made to PR c++/3747; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com>
To: "'jan@etpmod.phys.tue.nl'" <jan@etpmod.phys.tue.nl>,
   "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "'martin.gerbershagen@icn.siemens.de'" <apataki@apataki.dhs.org>,
   "'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "'nobody@gcc.gnu.org'"
	 <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/3747 ambiguity between `T operator[](unsigned)` and `T* o
	perator` 
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:39:24 -0000

 PR 3830 and PR 4556 appear to be duplicates, or at least closely related.
 These have been closed, and reporters added to the CC list. 

c++/3747: ambiguity between `T operator[](unsigned)` and `T* operator`

[jan]

>Number:         3747
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       ambiguity between `T operator[](unsigned)` and `T* operator`
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          rejects-legal
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Jul 20 08:16:03 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     jan@etpmod.phys.tue.nl
>Release:        gcc version 3.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
Linux 2.4.6,
Configured with: ../../src/egcs-3.0/configure --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --prefix=/usr/local/egcs-3.0
>Description:
The attached code (file strtest.cpp) fails to compile with egcs version 3.0 (or with the head branch). This is a regression wrt 2.95.x

Gcc-3.0:pcjan:/home/jan/src>g++ -c strtest.cpp
strtest.cpp:6: choosing `char& A::operator[](unsigned int)' over `operator[]'
strtest.cpp:6:   because worst conversion for the former is better than worst
   conversion for the latter

The compiler is in doubt: it cannot choose between A.operator[](0) and 
A.(operator const char*).`c-builtin[]`(0). IMHO the first conversion has preference and should be chosen. 
>How-To-Repeat:
Compile the attached file strtest.cpp
>Fix:
This bug breaks existing code, I could not think of a transparent workaround. If `0' is replaced with `0u' (unsigned 0), the snippet compiles properly.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
----gnatsweb-attachment----
Content-Type: text/x-c++src; name="strtest.cpp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="strtest.cpp"

c3RydWN0IEEgewoJY2hhciBvcGVyYXRvcltdKHVuc2lnbmVkKSBjb25zdDsKCW9wZXJhdG9yIGNv
bnN0IGNoYXIqKCkgY29uc3Q7Cn07CkEgczsKY2hhciBjPXNbMHVdOwo=