public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/4239: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend
@ 2002-02-26 14:22 nathan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: nathan @ 2002-02-26 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, sebor

Synopsis: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: nathan
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 26 14:19:04 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    I'll take your word that it's legal

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4239


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/4239: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend
@ 2002-12-19  8:09 lerdsuwa
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: lerdsuwa @ 2002-12-19  8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, sebor

Synopsis: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa
State-Changed-When: Thu Dec 19 08:09:31 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Fixed in 3.3 and main trunk.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4239


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* c++/4239: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend
@ 2001-09-05 12:16 sebor
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sebor @ 2001-09-05 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats

>Number:         4239
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Sep 05 12:16:00 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     sebor@roguewave.com
>Release:        gcc 3.0.1
>Organization:
>Environment:

>Description:
I think I reported this bug against 2.95.2 but I can't find
the PR. In any case, it's been discussed (*) on the core
reflector [ mailto:c++std-core@research.att.com ] and the
opinion seems to be that the the test case is legal. If
you disagree you may want to reopen the discussion and/or
file an issue (I don't think one has been filed).

Thanks
Martin

(*) see c++std-core-86{07,08,10,11,12,13,15}
>How-To-Repeat:
$ cat t.cpp ; g++ t.cpp
template <class T> struct S;

template <class T>
struct S<T*>
{
    struct X {
        friend struct S;
    };
};

int main ()
{
    S<int*>::X x;
}

t.cpp:7: partial specialization `S<T*>' declared `friend'
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-19 16:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-26 14:22 c++/4239: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend nathan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-19  8:09 lerdsuwa
2001-09-05 12:16 sebor

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).