public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/4239: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend
@ 2002-02-26 14:22 nathan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: nathan @ 2002-02-26 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, sebor
Synopsis: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: nathan
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 26 14:19:04 2002
State-Changed-Why:
I'll take your word that it's legal
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4239
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/4239: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend
@ 2002-12-19 8:09 lerdsuwa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: lerdsuwa @ 2002-12-19 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, sebor
Synopsis: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa
State-Changed-When: Thu Dec 19 08:09:31 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed in 3.3 and main trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4239
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* c++/4239: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend
@ 2001-09-05 12:16 sebor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sebor @ 2001-09-05 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats
>Number: 4239
>Category: c++
>Synopsis: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Wed Sep 05 12:16:00 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: sebor@roguewave.com
>Release: gcc 3.0.1
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
I think I reported this bug against 2.95.2 but I can't find
the PR. In any case, it's been discussed (*) on the core
reflector [ mailto:c++std-core@research.att.com ] and the
opinion seems to be that the the test case is legal. If
you disagree you may want to reopen the discussion and/or
file an issue (I don't think one has been filed).
Thanks
Martin
(*) see c++std-core-86{07,08,10,11,12,13,15}
>How-To-Repeat:
$ cat t.cpp ; g++ t.cpp
template <class T> struct S;
template <class T>
struct S<T*>
{
struct X {
friend struct S;
};
};
int main ()
{
S<int*>::X x;
}
t.cpp:7: partial specialization `S<T*>' declared `friend'
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-19 16:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-02-26 14:22 c++/4239: g++ 3.0.1 can't declare a partial specialization a friend nathan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-19 8:09 lerdsuwa
2001-09-05 12:16 sebor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).