public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* objc/5956: selectors aren't matched properly when added to the selector table
@ 2002-03-13 17:36 alexander
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: alexander @ 2002-03-13 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats


>Number:         5956
>Category:       objc
>Synopsis:       selectors aren't matched properly when added to the selector table
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          pessimizes-code
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Mar 13 17:36:00 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Alexander Malmberg
>Release:        gcc version 3.0.3
>Organization:
>Environment:

>Description:
Due to a simple mixup, build_typed_selector_reference() won't properly match the new selector with existing selectors (TREE_PURPOSE() and TREE_VALUE()) are mixed up).

This doesn't cause incorrect code, but the selector tables are unnecessarily large; it bloats all objective-c code (by approximately 10% in the cases I've measured).

I've attached a patch that fixes this.
>How-To-Repeat:
Compile any program that contains two references to the same selector, eg:

[someobject foo];
[someobject foo];

The resulting selector table will have to entries for 'foo'.
>Fix:
Apply the patch.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
----gnatsweb-attachment----
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="gcc_selector_match.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="gcc_selector_match.patch"
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^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: objc/5956: selectors aren't matched properly when added to the selector table
@ 2002-09-03  3:41 nicola
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: nicola @ 2002-09-03  3:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alexander, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nicola, nobody

Synopsis: selectors aren't matched properly when added to the selector table

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->nicola
Responsible-Changed-By: nicola
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Sep  3 03:41:00 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    I managed it
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: nicola
State-Changed-When: Tue Sep  3 03:41:00 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Thanks Alex - I had your patch (finally!) applied to GCC 3.3! :-)

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5956


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-03 10:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-03-13 17:36 objc/5956: selectors aren't matched properly when added to the selector table alexander
2002-09-03  3:41 nicola

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).