Re: bootstrap/5167: gcc-3.0.2 fails to bootstrap on Solaris 2.6

[Steven Sabean <Steven.Sabean@sun.com>]

The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/5167; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Sabean <Steven.Sabean@sun.com>
To: Steven.Sabean@sun.com, rodrigc@attbi.com
Cc: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
        nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bootstrap/5167: gcc-3.0.2 fails to bootstrap on Solaris 2.6
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:58:31 -0700 (MST)

 > To: Steven Sabean <Steven.Sabean@sun.com>
 > Cc: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, 
 nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
 > Subject: Re: bootstrap/5167: gcc-3.0.2 fails to bootstrap on Solaris 2.6
 > Mime-Version: 1.0
 > Content-Disposition: inline
 > User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
 > 
 > On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 03:21:26PM -0700, Steven Sabean wrote:
 > > Seems like a good way to keep the number of open bugs to a minimum is to 
 close 
 > > them without investigating at all, right?
 > 
 > I don't care for your tone.  Unlike you, I don't get paid by Sun
 > to do this work, and am strictly a volunteer for the GCC project.
 > So try to be nice.
 > 
 
 I apologize.  I found it incredibly frustrating to have a bug report closed 
 without anyone ever even trying to reproduce the problem.
 
 > > Why don't you try following the link to the "successful build report" you 
 > > mention?
 > > 
 > > You might notice that there is no report of a successful build of gcc-3.0.2 
 on 
 > > Solaris 2.6.
 > 
 > There is a successful build report of gcc 3.0.4 on Solaris 2.6.
 > 
 > gcc 3.0.4 has bugfixes on top of gcc 3.0.2.
 > So, this bug report is not worth keeping open in my opinion.
 
 Fair enough.  But why not just state that gcc-3.0.2 is no longer supported?
 
 > 
 > -- 
 > Craig Rodrigues        
 > http://www.gis.net/~craigr    
 > rodrigc@attbi.com
 
 
 -Steve Sabean
 Sun Microsystems