public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* c/6358: GCC 3.1 ICE on statement expressions
@ 2002-04-18  6:46 gbeauchesne
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: gbeauchesne @ 2002-04-18  6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats; +Cc: rth, jakub


>Number:         6358
>Category:       c
>Synopsis:       GCC 3.1 ICE on statement expressions
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          ice-on-legal-code
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Apr 18 06:46:08 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Gwenole Beauchesne
>Release:        GNU C version 3.1 20020418 (prerelease) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
>Organization:
>Environment:
i586-mandrake-linux-gnu
>Description:
gcc-3.1-branch ICEs on some statement expression returning void and enclosed in a function returning a value of floating type.

[gb@kernel gcc]$ ./cc1 ~/vrac/stmt_expr.c
 f
/home/gb/vrac/stmt_expr.c: In function `f':
/home/gb/vrac/stmt_expr.c:7: Internal compiler error in subst_stack_regs_pat, at reg-stack.c:1441
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
>How-To-Repeat:
You can compile the following testcase with or without any optimazations. The testcase came up while distilling a similar ICE for ggv 1.99.3 (bonobo/ggv-postscript-view.c).

void g();

double f()
{
  (void) ({ g(); return; });
  return 0.0;
}
>Fix:
The ICE does not occur if either return; of the statement expression is omitted or the return value of f() is changed to some other scalar (non floating) type.

Besides, this is a regression from gcc-3.0.4.

BTW, as far as I can tell, the enclosed testcase succeeds with
GNU C version 3.1 20010617 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)

but fails with:
GNU C version 3.1 20010715 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: c/6358: GCC 3.1 ICE on statement expressions
@ 2002-04-18 12:39 jakub
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: jakub @ 2002-04-18 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gbeauchesne, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jakub, nobody, rth

Synopsis: GCC 3.1 ICE on statement expressions

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: jakub
State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 18 12:39:00 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6358


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: c/6358: GCC 3.1 ICE on statement expressions
@ 2002-04-18  7:45 jakub
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: jakub @ 2002-04-18  7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gbeauchesne, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jakub, nobody, rth

Synopsis: GCC 3.1 ICE on statement expressions

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: jakub
State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 18 07:45:44 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    I don't think ice-on-legal-code is the right class,
    at least ISO C99 forbids return without value in function
    returning a value.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6358


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-18 19:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-18  6:46 c/6358: GCC 3.1 ICE on statement expressions gbeauchesne
2002-04-18  7:45 jakub
2002-04-18 12:39 jakub

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).