public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: c/6300: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 15:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020421221601.13383.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR c/6300; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
To: zack@codesourcery.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: c/6300: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:11:36 -0400 (EDT)

  > From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
  > 
  > An i686-linux -> sparcv9-solaris2.7 cross compiler produces
  > 
  > charconst.c:10:5: empty character constant
  > charconst.c:12:5: empty character constant
  > charconst.c:14:5: warning: character constant too long
  > charconst.c:16:5: warning: character constant too long
  > charconst.c:19:5: warning: multi-character character constant
  > charconst.c:24:11: empty character constant
  > charconst.c:25:7: empty character constant
  > charconst.c:27:7: warning: character constant too long
  > charconst.c:28:7: warning: character constant too long
  > charconst.c:31:7: warning: multi-character character constant
  > 
  > which is the expected result.  Can you still reproduce the problem?
  > zw
 
 Yes, however now it appears on plain sparc- targets, not sparcv9-
 because of some config.guess hackery that was eventually reverted.
 (See the 4/18 comment I added to the PR description field.)
 
 Sorry if this is confusing, but there was a short period where some
 unrelated patches were installed which changed the meaning of sparc-
 vs sparcv9- vs sparc64-.  After the dust settled, it was reverted by
 rth.  But I had reported the problem while my host temporarily called
 itself sparcv9-.
 
 Now that's gone and you should see the bug on sparc-sun-solaris2.7.  I
 updated the PR to explain that but I guess I wasn't clear or needed to
 cc you directly.  Sorry if I caused you to waste some time but
 hopefully you can reproduce the problem using the right target.
 
 		--Kaveh
 --
 Kaveh R. Ghazi			Director of Systems Architecture
 ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		Qwest Global Services


             reply	other threads:[~2002-04-21 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-21 15:16 Kaveh R. Ghazi [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-20 14:26 Zack Weinberg
2002-04-16 17:26 Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-04-15 14:06 Kaveh R. Ghazi
2002-04-15 11:16 Neil Booth
2002-04-14  9:26 ghazi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020421221601.13383.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).