Re: target/592: [ARM/Thumb] Poor choice of PIC register

Re: target/592: [ARM/Thumb] Poor choice of PIC register

[rearnsha]

Synopsis: [ARM/Thumb] Poor choice of PIC register

Responsible-Changed-From-To: pb->rearnsha
Responsible-Changed-By: rearnsha
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Apr 23 08:44:20 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    .
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->suspended
State-Changed-By: rearnsha
State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 23 08:44:20 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Having given this some consideration, I'm no-longer convinced that
    fixing a lo reigster is a good idea: it would unduly pessimize
    other code and might lead to situations where we would run
    out of registers.
    The best solution would be to make the PIC register a pseudo,
    but apparently there are other issues that prevent this.
    
    I believe the orignal problem that provoked this report has now
    been resolved.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=592

Re: target/592: [ARM/Thumb] Poor choice of PIC register

[pb]

Old Synopsis: [ARM (thumb mode)] Insn bug with -fpic flag
New Synopsis: [ARM/Thumb] Poor choice of PIC register

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->pb
Responsible-Changed-By: pb
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jan 22 03:05:37 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    .

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=592