public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c/2160: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
@ 2002-04-25 17:45 rth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rth @ 2002-04-25 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: anton, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jsm28, nobody
Synopsis: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: rth
State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 25 17:45:27 2002
State-Changed-Why:
This is the known computed-goto cfg manipulation problem.
We've got nearly complete connectivity between a very large
number of blocks, and we eat all that ram and time futzing
with the edges between them.
As such, I'm closing this as a duplicate of 4313, which
identifies the problem more clearly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2160
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: c/2160: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
@ 2001-07-23 3:16 Anton Ertl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anton Ertl @ 2001-07-23 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c/2160; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Anton Ertl <anton@a0.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: c/2160: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:12:53 +0200 (MET DST)
[This is a copy of a message already sent to
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, nobody@gcc.gnu.org]
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> Feedback at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-06/msg01531.html
> (not sent to gcc-gnats, so not filed with this PR).
Should I do something else than replying to all recipients of your mail?
> Excess memory consumption is still a bug; changed from
> ice-on-legal-code to sw-bug.
I finally managed to compile this file on an Alpha with 1GB with
gcc-3.0 with
gcc -mieee -c engine.i
Top showed about 1550MB virtual memory consumption during most of the
time. Top showed that the CPU was mostly in system or idle mode, with
only about 0.5% user time; took about 30 hours. The compiler produced
a file engine.o, so I assume the compilation went ok (unfortunately I
was not smart enough to log the output and status).
- anton
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: c/2160: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
@ 2001-07-23 3:06 Joseph S. Myers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2001-07-23 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c/2160; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c/2160: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:05:32 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Anton Ertl wrote:
> > (not sent to gcc-gnats, so not filed with this PR).
>
> Should I do something else than replying to all recipients of your mail?
It needs to go to gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org to be filed with the PR. GNATS
status change messages used to include this address in the headers, but it
seems they don't any more. This is a bug in the bug tracking system
configuration.
> > Excess memory consumption is still a bug; changed from
> > ice-on-legal-code to sw-bug.
>
> I finally managed to compile this file on an Alpha with 1GB with
> gcc-3.0 with
>
> gcc -mieee -c engine.i
>
> Top showed about 1550MB virtual memory consumption during most of the
> time. Top showed that the CPU was mostly in system or idle mode, with
> only about 0.5% user time; took about 30 hours. The compiler produced
> a file engine.o, so I assume the compilation went ok (unfortunately I
> was not smart enough to log the output and status).
>
> - anton
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: c/2160: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
@ 2001-07-20 14:17 jsm28
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 @ 2001-07-20 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: anton, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jsm28, nobody
Synopsis: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->analyzed
State-Changed-By: jsm28
State-Changed-When: Fri Jul 20 14:17:36 2001
State-Changed-Why:
Feedback at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2001-06/msg01531.html
(not sent to gcc-gnats, so not filed with this PR).
Excess memory consumption is still a bug; changed from
ice-on-legal-code to sw-bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2160&database=gcc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: c/2160: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
@ 2001-06-22 5:09 jsm28
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 @ 2001-06-22 5:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: anton, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jsm28, nobody
Synopsis: signal 11 when compiling large generated program
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: jsm28
State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 22 05:09:19 2001
State-Changed-Why:
Does this problem still occur with GCC 3.0?
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2160&database=gcc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-26 0:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-25 17:45 c/2160: signal 11 when compiling large generated program rth
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-23 3:16 Anton Ertl
2001-07-23 3:06 Joseph S. Myers
2001-07-20 14:17 jsm28
2001-06-22 5:09 jsm28
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).