public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: libstdc++/6811: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release
@ 2002-05-26 2:06 paolo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: paolo @ 2002-05-26 2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: carlo, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody
Synopsis: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: paolo
State-Changed-When: Sun May 26 01:54:45 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Of course, in principle you are 100% right.
Perhaps you can provide a code snippet which actually
demonstrates the bug?
It would help preparing a testcase for regression testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6811
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++/6811: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release
@ 2002-05-26 8:03 paolo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: paolo @ 2002-05-26 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: carlo, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, paolo
Synopsis: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->paolo
Responsible-Changed-By: paolo
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun May 26 07:54:41 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
.
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: paolo
State-Changed-When: Sun May 26 07:54:41 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg02061.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6811
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++/6811: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release
@ 2002-05-26 6:56 Paolo Carlini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Carlini @ 2002-05-26 6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/6811; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com>
Cc: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, carlo@alinoe.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/6811: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const
__enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release
Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 15:14:06 +0200
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>paolo@gcc.gnu.org writes:
>
>| Synopsis: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release
>|
>| State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
>| State-Changed-By: paolo
>| State-Changed-When: Sun May 26 01:54:45 2002
>| State-Changed-Why:
>| Of course, in principle you are 100% right.
>| Perhaps you can provide a code snippet which actually
>| demonstrates the bug?
>
>Hmm, I think it is hard to devise a portable testcase for that. We
>should just recognize we err and apply the correct fix.
>
Ok, I will.
Thanks, Paolo.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: libstdc++/6811: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release
@ 2002-05-26 6:16 Gabriel Dos Reis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Dos Reis @ 2002-05-26 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/6811; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com>
To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: carlo@alinoe.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/6811: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release
Date: 26 May 2002 15:03:01 +0200
paolo@gcc.gnu.org writes:
| Synopsis: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release
|
| State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
| State-Changed-By: paolo
| State-Changed-When: Sun May 26 01:54:45 2002
| State-Changed-Why:
| Of course, in principle you are 100% right.
| Perhaps you can provide a code snippet which actually
| demonstrates the bug?
Hmm, I think it is hard to devise a portable testcase for that. We
should just recognize we err and apply the correct fix.
-- Gaby
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* libstdc++/6811: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release
@ 2002-05-25 6:16 carlo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: carlo @ 2002-05-25 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats
>Number: 6811
>Category: libstdc++
>Synopsis: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Sat May 25 05:46:01 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: carlo@alinoe.com
>Release: 3.1
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
Missing 'return *this'
in
/usr/local/gcc-3.1/include/g++-v3/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/codecvt_specializations.h
__enc_traits&
operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)
{
strncpy(_M_int_enc, __obj._M_int_enc, _S_max_size);
strncpy(_M_ext_enc, __obj._M_ext_enc, _S_max_size);
_M_in_desc = 0;
_M_out_desc = 0;
_M_ext_bom = __obj._M_ext_bom;
_M_int_bom = __obj._M_int_bom;
}
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-26 14:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-26 2:06 libstdc++/6811: Missing 'return *this' in __enc_traits& operator=(const __enc_traits& __obj)' in 3.1 release paolo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-26 8:03 paolo
2002-05-26 6:56 Paolo Carlini
2002-05-26 6:16 Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-05-25 6:16 carlo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).