public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: libstdc++/4436: const_reverse_iterator rend()const;
@ 2002-05-31 12:50 paolo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: paolo @ 2002-05-31 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, paolo, tyler

Synopsis: const_reverse_iterator rend()const;

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->paolo
Responsible-Changed-By: paolo
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri May 31 12:39:49 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    Triaged.
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: paolo
State-Changed-When: Fri May 31 12:39:49 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Indeed, the relevant DR is #280, which however is still in
    the *open* state: this means that, for the time being, the
    ISO Standard holds and there is *no* requirement for
    reverse_iterator to be comparable to const
    reverse_iterator. In the current state of affairs, with
    both libstdc++-v3 and other conforming implementations
    the line 'di != d.rend();' of your testcase cannot be
    compiled.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4436


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-05-31 19:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-31 12:50 libstdc++/4436: const_reverse_iterator rend()const; paolo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).