Re: c/7010: Bug in 3.1 with inline memcpy

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>]

The following reply was made to PR c/7010; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
Cc: Martin Kahlert <martin.kahlert@infineon.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
   rth@cygnus.com, aj@suse.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/7010: Bug in 3.1 with inline memcpy
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 12:13:12 -0400

 On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 06:05:55PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
 > > #include <string.h>
 > > 
 > > int main()
 > > {
 > >  char dst[16];
 > >  char src[16];
 > >  int tocopy = 5;
 > > 
 > >  memcpy (dst+5, src, tocopy);
 > > 
 > >  return 0;
 > > }
 > 
 > Oh no, another pasto in my code :(
 > I am just proffreading both functions to catch similar bugs, if they
 > exists.
 > 
 > Bootstrapped/regtested branch, OK for mainline/branch?
 > Ok to add testcase into mainline testsuite?
 
 I think the testcase would be useful on branch too, just
 it shouldn't use string.h but whatever simplified code reproduces this
 (as with string.h it depends on what exact libc you're using etc.).
 
 	Jakub