public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: optimization/7409: loop optimization
@ 2002-07-26 5:16 Bernhard Kaindl
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bernhard Kaindl @ 2002-07-26 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3429 bytes --]
The following reply was made to PR optimization/7409; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Bernhard Kaindl <bk@suse.de>
To: <hpenner@de.ibm.com>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <mark@codesourcery.com>,
<uweigand@de.ibm.com>, <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, Reinhard Max <max@suse.de>
Subject: Re: optimization/7409: loop optimization
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:11:51 +0200 (CEST)
On 25 Jul 2002 hpenner@de.ibm.com wrote:
> >Description:
> loop_optimize deletes an insn, which should not be deleted.
> This leads to a abort of an application (tcl).
Yes, it leads to an abort in different 8.x tcl versions when
running the included testsuite on s390x with gcc-3.1.1-cvs,
but it looks like it can be worked around by changing the
-O1 in the Makefile ot -O0 or -O2.
Just to bring all the info together, I append some mails
also describing the problem, a testcase and a proposed fix.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hartmut Penner <HPENNER@de.ibm.com>
To: mark@codesourcery.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: uweigand@de.ibm.com
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 19:53:53 +0200
Subject: PR 7409/Loop optimization bug patch
A proposed patch for problem described in PR7409 is appended here.
The problem was, that the usage of a register as a parameter was not taken
into acount in the function find_single_use_in_loop.
Index: loop.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/loop.c,v
retrieving revision 1.389.2.7
diff -u -r1.389.2.7 loop.c
--- loop.c 15 Jun 2002 01:12:04 -0000 1.389.2.7
+++ loop.c 25 Jul 2002 17:41:28 -0000
@@ -3448,6 +3448,19 @@
const char *fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT (code);
int i, j;
+ if (x == PATTERN (insn) && GET_CODE (insn) == CALL_INSN)
+ {
+ rtx link;
+ for (link = CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE (insn); link; link = XEXP (link, 1))
+ {
+ rtx op, reg;
+
+ if (GET_CODE (op = XEXP (link, 0)) == USE
+ && GET_CODE (reg = XEXP (op, 0)) == REG)
+ regs->array[REGNO (reg)].single_usage = const0_rtx;
+ }
+ }
+
if (code == REG)
regs->array[REGNO (x)].single_usage
= (regs->array[REGNO (x)].single_usage != 0
Mit freundlichem Gruß / Best regards,
Hartmut Penner
GCC for S/390 Development
---------- Forwarded message ----------
The testcase is from Tcl and is accessibel there under the name tclUtil
which is the file where the problem appears:
http://www.suse.de/~bk/gcc/testcases/
cc -S -g -O1 -fPIC tclUtil.i
This is the assembler code generated to call TclFindElement (only one
place in the file):
lgfr %r4,%r8
la %r1,184(%r15)
stg %r1,160(%r15)
la %r1,188(%r15)
stg %r1,168(%r15)
lg %r2,200(%r15)
lgr %r3,%r10
la %r5,192(%r15)
+ la %r6,176(%r15)
brasl %r14,TclFindElement@PLT
Adding the line marked with + fixes the passing of a pointer onto the
stack and fixes this particulare case.
There are other cases on tcl which -O1 also cause segementation violations,
I hope that the other cases are also fixed with the patch above, it's likely
that the conditions of the other uses of TclFindElement are similar.
Best Regards
Bernhard Kaindl
Research & Development SuSE Linux S/390 and zSeries
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: optimization/7409: loop optimization
@ 2002-10-15 10:04 uweigand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: uweigand @ 2002-10-15 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, hpenner, mark, uweigand, nobody, uweigand
Synopsis: loop optimization
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->uweigand
Responsible-Changed-By: uweigand
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Oct 15 10:04:09 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Fixed.
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: uweigand
State-Changed-When: Tue Oct 15 10:04:09 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed in 3.2.1 and 3.3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7409
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* optimization/7409: loop optimization
@ 2002-07-25 10:36 hpenner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: hpenner @ 2002-07-25 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats; +Cc: mark, uweigand
>Number: 7409
>Category: optimization
>Synopsis: loop optimization
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Thu Jul 25 10:36:00 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: hpenner@de.ibm.com
>Release: 3.1.1 20020725 (prerelease)
>Organization:
>Environment:
s390x-linux-gnu
>Description:
loop_optimize deletes an insn, which should not be deleted.
This leads to a abort of an application (tcl).
Scenario:
(set (reg 128) (plus (reg fp) (const_int 176)))
(set (reg 6) (reg 128))
(set (reg 2) call ()
(expr_list (use (reg 6))))
(set (reg 96) (reg 6))
Loop optimizer thinks register 6 is in single usage, and hence delete the insn which sets register 6. This is done,
since register 6 is call-saved and a parameter.
Delete code in loop.c:876-909.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-15 17:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-26 5:16 optimization/7409: loop optimization Bernhard Kaindl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-15 10:04 uweigand
2002-07-25 10:36 hpenner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).