Re: c++/7468: prototype "doesn't match" a candidate that is actually a perfect match.

[Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>]

The following reply was made to PR c++/7468; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/7468: prototype "doesn't match" a candidate that is actually a perfect match.
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 14:20:58 +0200

 On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:55:41AM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
 > carlo@alinoe.com writes:
 > 
 > [...]
 > 
 > | Note that the error goes away
 > | when either
 > | 1) the template is removed
 > | 2) the static const is removed and '4' is put directly in the typedef
 > | 3) the typedef is replaced by a more normal typedef
 > | 4) the (foo_t*) is replaced with (foo_t)
 > | 
 > | Very peculiar bug.
 > 
 > Indeed.  This bug is actually a duplicate of old PRs (I don't have the
 > id off hand but I do know it is there since :-).  I'll close yours and
 > mention the previous entry.  OK?
 > 
 > -- Gaby
 
 Hmm, not really ok unless you are sure it will be fixed.
 This problem looks a bit like PR 54, but that has been suspended
 for "years" :/.  Besides, it says "it was fixed" (a year ago),
 so are you SURE this isn't a new bug?
 
 -- 
 Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>