public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: other/7535: GCC configuration problem: failed to correctly de tect hidden attribute support
@ 2002-08-08 6:36 Zagorodnev, Grigory
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zagorodnev, Grigory @ 2002-08-08 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR other/7535; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Zagorodnev, Grigory" <Grigory_Zagorodnev@stl.sarov.ru>
To: "'nathan@gcc.gnu.org'" <nathan@gcc.gnu.org>,
"'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'"
<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
"'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
"Zagorodnev, Grigory" <Grigory_Zagorodnev@stl.sarov.ru>,
"'nobody@gcc.gnu.org'" <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
"'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'"
<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:
Subject: RE: other/7535: GCC configuration problem: failed to correctly de
tect hidden attribute support
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:12:54 +0400
And more below...
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: nathan
> State-Changed-When: Thu Aug 8 03:57:17 2002
> State-Changed-Why:
> This is a binutils bug. From gcc's configure.in
> # GNU LD versions before 2.12.1 have buggy support for
> STV_HIDDEN.
> # This is irritatingly difficult to feature test for. Look for
> # the date string after the version number.
> binutils after 2.12.1 are known good
Few lines below, same gcc's configure.in does try to test 'hidden' feature
of binutils older then 2.12.1. As far as I understand, this checking is
failing. Is'n it?
Generally, I agree that usage of buggy functionality is not a good idea. And
suppose it is reasonable to ignore it.
But the implementation does not provide any alternative to 'hidden'. That
makes __cxa_atexit/__cxa_finalize inapplicable.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: other/7535: GCC configuration problem: failed to correctly de tect hidden attribute support
@ 2002-08-08 4:26 Zagorodnev, Grigory
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zagorodnev, Grigory @ 2002-08-08 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR other/7535; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Zagorodnev, Grigory" <Grigory_Zagorodnev@stl.sarov.ru>
To: "'nathan@gcc.gnu.org'" <nathan@gcc.gnu.org>,
"'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'"
<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
"'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
"Zagorodnev, Grigory" <Grigory_Zagorodnev@stl.sarov.ru>,
"'nobody@gcc.gnu.org'" <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
"'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'"
<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:
Subject: RE: other/7535: GCC configuration problem: failed to correctly de
tect hidden attribute support
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:20:16 +0400
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: nathan
> State-Changed-When: Thu Aug 8 03:57:17 2002
> State-Changed-Why:
> This is a binutils bug. From gcc's configure.in
> # GNU LD versions before 2.12.1 have buggy support for
> STV_HIDDEN.
> # This is irritatingly difficult to feature test for. Look for
> # the date string after the version number.
> binutils after 2.12.1 are known good
Few lines below, same gcc's configure.in does try to test 'hidden' feature
of binutils older then 2.12.1. As far as I understand, this checking is
failing. Is'n it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-08 12:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-08 6:36 other/7535: GCC configuration problem: failed to correctly de tect hidden attribute support Zagorodnev, Grigory
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-08 4:26 Zagorodnev, Grigory
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).