public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jcas@netcabo.pt To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: c/7857: Different behaviour if compiled with optimization! Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 07:46:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20020908143646.962.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) >Number: 7857 >Category: c >Synopsis: Different behaviour if compiled with optimization! >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Sun Sep 08 07:46:00 PDT 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Jose Santos >Release: 3.10 >Organization: >Environment: Windows XP >Description: If code is compiled with any optimization (-O1 to -O3) it has a different behaviour than with compiled with no optimizations. The code is related with precision errors.With optimizations there are no precision errors, without optimization there's a precision error! >How-To-Repeat: Just run the file with -O3 and without -O3 and see that in first case it runs fine(requires a couple of seconds, eg: 15s), in second case it enters an infinite loop(and just ends after looping all integers back to 0) >Fix: Don't known...perhaps don't use the sqrt function ? >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: ----gnatsweb-attachment---- Content-Type: text/plain; name="bug.c" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="bug.c" #include <stdio.h> #include <math.h> /* Compile with -O3 and runs fine without there's a precision error. SQ's value has the correct value with -O3 (+1 than without -O3 for n==46611179) E-mail me at jcas@netcabo.pt */ #define NUMPAIRS 10 int main(){ long long n=2, count = 0; for(n=2; count<NUMPAIRS; n++){ long long n2 =n*n; //double sq = sqrt(1+8.0*n2); long long sq = sqrt(1+8*n2); long long k = -(1 - sq)/2; long long k2 = k*k; if(n==46611179) printf("%lld, %lld\n", sq, k); if(2*n2==k2+k){ printf("%10lld %10lld\n", n, k); count++; } } return 0; }
next reply other threads:[~2002-09-08 14:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2002-09-08 7:46 jcas [this message] 2002-10-09 10:16 Pop Sébastian
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20020908143646.962.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=jcas@netcabo.pt \ --cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).