public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pop Sébastian" <pop@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: c/7857: Different behaviour if compiled with optimization! Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:16:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20021009171602.10354.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR c/7857; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pop_S=E9bastian?= <pop@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr> To: jcas@netcabo.pt Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, austern@apple.com Subject: Re: c/7857: Different behaviour if compiled with optimization! Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:15:06 +0200 On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 02:36:46PM -0000, jcas@netcabo.pt wrote: > /* > Compile with -O3 and runs fine > without there's a precision error. > SQ's value has the correct value with -O3 (+1 than without -O3 for n==46611179) > Reproduced with gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease) version gcc 3.3 20021007 (experimental) Compiling the bug report without -O3 gives an error: "Undefined reference to 'sqrt'". For completing the link we have to specify the -lm. Thus with no optimization, the 'sqrt' function is the one defined in the math library, whereas with -O3 the 'sqrt' function is the one defined by GCC... (I think) I hope that this helps, Sebastian. pop@gauvain:~/gcc/main/test$ ../usr/bin/gcc -o pr7857 ./pr7857.c -O3 pop@gauvain:~/gcc/main/test$ ../usr/bin/gcc -o pr7857 ./pr7857.c /tmp/emacs-09607/cc4vzVim.o: dans la fonction `main': /tmp/emacs-09607/cc4vzVim.o(.text+0xaf): r\351f\351rence ind\351finie vers `sqrt' collect2: ld a retourn\351 1 code d'\351tat d'ex\351cution pop@gauvain:~/gcc/main/test$ ../usr/bin/gcc -o pr7857 ./pr7857.c -lm pop@gauvain:~/gcc/main/test$
next reply other threads:[~2002-10-09 17:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2002-10-09 10:16 Pop Sébastian [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2002-09-08 7:46 jcas
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20021009171602.10354.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=pop@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).