public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: optimization/6405: Loop-unrolling related performance regressions
@ 2002-09-08 11:47 sayle
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sayle @ 2002-09-08 11:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, roger

Synopsis: Loop-unrolling related performance regressions

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: sayle
State-Changed-When: Sun Sep  8 11:47:35 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    This has now been fixed on mainline by the following patch:
    
    2002-09-08  Roger Sayle  <roger@eyesopen.com>
    
            PR optimization/6405
            * unroll.c (loop_iterations): last_loop_insn should be the previous
            non-note instruction before loop->end.
            * loop.c (strength_reduce): The conditional jump is the last
            non-note instruction before loop->end (as above).

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6405


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* optimization/6405: Loop-unrolling related performance regressions
@ 2002-04-22  7:56 roger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: roger @ 2002-04-22  7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats; +Cc: roger


>Number:         6405
>Category:       optimization
>Synopsis:       Loop-unrolling related performance regressions
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          pessimizes-code
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Apr 22 07:56:00 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com>
>Release:        gcc-3.1 branch and mainline 20020422
>Organization:
>Environment:
All platforms, but first observed on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
>Description:
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-02/msg00307.html

With the command line options "-O3 -funroll-loops", GCC 2.96
generates better code for the attached loop than GCC 3.1
(prerelease) or mainline.  A correctness fix had the side
effect that the compiler can no longer determine that this
loop iterates a fix number of times.
>How-To-Repeat:
Compile the attached loop.c with "-O2 -funroll-all-loops"
and inspect the assembly code generated.
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
----gnatsweb-attachment----
Content-Type: application/x-unknown-content-type-cfile; name="loop.c"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="loop.c"

Y29uc3QgaW50IGZlYXR1cmVfdGltZXMgPSAyNTsKCmV4dGVybiB2b2lkIGZvbyh2b2lkKTsKCnZv
aWQKdGVzdCAodm9pZCkKewogICBpbnQgaSA9IDE7CgogICBmb3IgKDs7KQogICAgIHsKICAgICAg
IGZvbyAoKTsKICAgICAgIGkrKzsKICAgICAgIGlmIChpID4gZmVhdHVyZV90aW1lcykKICAgICAg
ICAgYnJlYWs7CiAgICAgfQp9Cgo=


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-08 18:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-08 11:47 optimization/6405: Loop-unrolling related performance regressions sayle
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-22  7:56 roger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).