public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/7015: certain __asm__ constructs rejected
@ 2002-10-01 12:23 nathan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: nathan @ 2002-10-01 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jbeulich, nathan

Synopsis: certain __asm__ constructs rejected

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: nathan
State-Changed-When: Tue Oct  1 12:23:30 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    fixed

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7015


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/7015: certain __asm__ constructs rejected
@ 2002-09-16  1:15 nathan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: nathan @ 2002-09-16  1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jbeulich, nathan, nobody

Synopsis: certain __asm__ constructs rejected

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->nathan
Responsible-Changed-By: nathan
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Sep 16 01:15:40 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    patching
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->analyzed
State-Changed-By: nathan
State-Changed-When: Mon Sep 16 01:15:40 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    test case received

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7015


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/7015: certain __asm__ constructs rejected
@ 2002-09-14 14:59 nathan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: nathan @ 2002-09-14 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jbeulich, nobody

Synopsis: certain __asm__ constructs rejected

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: nathan
State-Changed-When: Sat Sep 14 14:59:47 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    although obvious, could you provide a test case that I 
    can insert in the testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7015


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* c++/7015: certain __asm__ constructs rejected
@ 2002-06-13  4:06 jbeulich
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jbeulich @ 2002-06-13  4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats


>Number:         7015
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       certain __asm__ constructs rejected
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          rejects-legal
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Jun 13 04:06:01 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Jan Beulich
>Release:        3.1
>Organization:
>Environment:
Cross compilers running on Cygwin (Win2K).
>Description:
finish_asm_stmt, in its output_operands loop, sets 'operand'
to the same value for all output operands, thus causing
problems with the mark_addressable call at the bottom of the
loop.
>How-To-Repeat:
The problem is obvious, and I don't have a specific example
at hand.
>Fix:
Replace

operand = TREE_VALUE (output_operands);

with

operand = TREE_VALUE (t);
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-01 19:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-01 12:23 c++/7015: certain __asm__ constructs rejected nathan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-16  1:15 nathan
2002-09-14 14:59 nathan
2002-06-13  4:06 jbeulich

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).