public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: libstdc++/8230: Buggy allocator behaviour
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021115224603.14119.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/8230; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
Cc: Matt Austern <austern@apple.com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>,
   bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, jkanze@caicheuvreux.com,
   gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/8230: Buggy allocator behaviour
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 14:41:38 -0800

 On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 11:27:17PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
 > Maybe RTH could provide us with some datapoint here?
 
 "It depends".
 
 > | Second, if the answer to question 1 is "a lot": is there some sensible
 > | way to use this in the compiler itself?  I suppose it'd have to involve
 > | some ghastly macro hackery because of the bootstrap problem, but
 > | it we're talking big performance wins, it might be worth it.
 > 
 > If the answer to the first question is "a lot", then I agree with you
 > that it makes perfect sense to use it in the compiler itself.  I
 > could imagine something along the lines
 > 
 > #if !defined(__GNUC__) || __GNUC__ < 3  /* correct the version number */
 > #  define __builtin_expect(EXP, PROB) EXP
 > #endif
 > 
 > in system.h or wherever appropriate.
 
 I don't think it's worth it, except _possibly_ in the 
 ENABLE_CHECKING macros.
 
 
 r~


             reply	other threads:[~2002-11-15 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-21 14:01 Richard Henderson [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-23  1:16 bkoz
2002-11-21  4:06 Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-11-21  3:47 Matt Austern
2002-11-20 23:03 Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-11-20 19:09 Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-11-20 18:20 Benjamin Kosnik
2002-11-20 18:19 Benjamin Kosnik
2002-11-20 18:02 Gabriel Dos Reis
2002-11-20  5:07 bkoz
2002-10-15  5:56 gdr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021115224603.14119.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=rth@redhat.com \
    --cc=bkoz@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).