Re: c/8647: [3.3 regression] ICE in GNU99 mode Nr. #2

Re: c/8647: [3.3 regression] ICE in GNU99 mode Nr. #2

[bangerth]

Old Synopsis: ICE in GNU99 mode Nr. #2
New Synopsis: [3.3 regression] ICE in GNU99 mode Nr. #2

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Wed Dec  4 14:13:45 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Confirmed. It is a mainline regression, 3.2 compiled this
    just fine.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8647

Re: c/8647: [3.3 regression] ICE in GNU99 mode Nr. #2

[xmaster]

The following reply was made to PR c/8647; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "xmaster" <xmaster@gmx.net>
To: <bkausbk@web.de>,
	<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/8647: [3.3 regression] ICE in GNU99 mode Nr. #2
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:29:41 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p
 r=8647
 
 Even on prerelease version of GCC 3.4 (3.4 20021227 (experimental))
 This error will occur:
 
 gcc test.c -Wp,-std=gnu99
 test.c: In function `m':
 test.c:3: error: parse error before '*' token
 test.c:4: internal compiler error: in genrtl_compound_stmt, at
 c-semantics.c:726
 
 Benjamin Kalytta
 

Re: c/8647: [3.3 regression] ICE in GNU99 mode Nr. #2

[Janis Johnson]

The following reply was made to PR c/8647; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
To: bkausbk@web.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/8647: [3.3 regression] ICE in GNU99 mode Nr. #2
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:06:42 -0800

 PR c/8647 reports a regression in 3.3 (also now in the
 mainline) for an ICE for illegal code.  There is a valid
 error message before the ICE.  The ICE message started
 showing up with this patch:
 
 2002-01-23  Zack Weinberg  <zack@codesourcery.com>
 
         * diagnostic.c (internal_error): Do ICE suppression
         only when ENABLE_CHECKING is not defined.
 
 So, although there is an ICE, this is not a regression and
 the ICE message will not appear with a release version of
 GCC.
 
 I recommend lowering the priority of this PR and removing
 "regression" from the synopsis.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8647