public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: optimization/9016: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] Failure to consistently constant fold "constant" C++ objects
@ 2002-12-21 10:47 bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: bangerth @ 2002-12-21 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, martin, nobody

Old Synopsis: Failure to consistently constant fold "constant" C++ objects
New Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] Failure to consistently constant fold "constant" C++ objects

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Sat Dec 21 10:47:43 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Confirmed. This is actually a regression: up to gcc3.0.4,
    all four functions were compiled just as f1(), i.e. in
    an optimal way. Starting with 3.2, f2-f4 show the behavior
    Martin demonstrated. Not good :-(

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9016


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-12-21 18:47 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-21 10:47 optimization/9016: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] Failure to consistently constant fold "constant" C++ objects bangerth

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).