public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/9236: Initializing enum values with template arguments does not work
@ 2003-01-09 14:46 Wolfgang Bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2003-01-09 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c++/9236; it has been noted by GNATS.

>From bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu  Mon Jan 13 00:44:10 2003
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>,
   <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
   <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/9236: Initializing enum values with template arguments does
 not work
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 08:37:39 -0600 (CST)

 > Synopsis: Initializing enum values with template arguments does not work
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 >     The compiler is (correctly) complaining about the
 >     semicolon after "i=N". Just delete it and the code
 >     compiles fine.
 
 How embarrassing :-( I apologize...
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth             email:            bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
 
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/9236: Initializing enum values with template arguments does not work
@ 2003-01-09  1:23 reichelt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: reichelt @ 2003-01-09  1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bangerth, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody

Synopsis: Initializing enum values with template arguments does not work

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: reichelt
State-Changed-When: Wed Jan  8 17:22:59 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Not a bug.
    
    The compiler is (correctly) complaining about the
    semicolon after "i=N". Just delete it and the code
    compiles fine.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9236


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* c++/9236: Initializing enum values with template arguments does not work
@ 2003-01-09  1:06 bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-01-09  1:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats


>Number:         9236
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       Initializing enum values with template arguments does not work
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Jan 08 17:06:00 PST 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Wolfgang Bangerth
>Release:        unknown-1.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
all gcc versions since at least 2.95
>Description:
Based on the assumption that initializers for local
static member variables and enums should have to fulfil
the same requirements (const-expr), I tried this:
--------------------------
template <int N> struct X {
    static const int j=N;
    enum I { i=N; };
};
--------------------------
However, while the static variable is ok, the enum member
is not:
  tmp/g> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4-pre/bin/c++ -c x.cc
  x.cc:3: error: expected `}'
  x.cc:4: error: expected declaration

Is my understanding wrong, or is it gcc?

W.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-09 14:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-09 14:46 c++/9236: Initializing enum values with template arguments does not work Wolfgang Bangerth
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-09  1:23 reichelt
2003-01-09  1:06 bangerth

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).