public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* c++/9256: C++ compiler conformance to Standard proposal 337
@ 2003-01-09 23:36 pavel_vozenilek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: pavel_vozenilek @ 2003-01-09 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats
>Number: 9256
>Category: c++
>Synopsis: C++ compiler conformance to Standard proposal 337
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Thu Jan 09 15:36:01 PST 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Pavel Vozenilek
>Release: unknown-1.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
The proposal is on page: http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#337. Its state is 'ready'.
Comeau 3, VC 7.1beta and Intel C++ 7.0 already support this feature.
It may be used e.g. to implement is_abstract_class<> as in http://groups.google.com/groups?q=is_abstract_class+group:comp.lang.c%2B%2B.moderated&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=df893da6.0207110613.75b2fe90%40posting.google.com&rnum=1
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/9256: C++ compiler conformance to Standard proposal 337
@ 2003-01-10 1:02 bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-01-10 1:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, pavel_vozenilek
Synopsis: C++ compiler conformance to Standard proposal 337
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 9 17:02:29 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Confirmed. A simple testcase is that this must not compile:
------------------------
struct Abstract {
virtual void f() = 0;
};
Abstract (*a)[2];
--------------------------
A more complicated that this should succeed at run-time:
--------------------------
#include <cassert>
// must match all non-abstract types (except U=void, U a reference, etc)
template<typename U>
int check(U (*)[1]) { return 1;};
// worst case match for everything else
template<typename U>
int check(...) { return 2;};
struct Abstract {
virtual void f() = 0;
};
int main ()
{
assert (check<int> (0) == 1);
assert (check<Abstract> (0) == 2);
};
--------------------------
gcc3.4 is wrong on both testcases.
W.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9256
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-10 1:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-09 23:36 c++/9256: C++ compiler conformance to Standard proposal 337 pavel_vozenilek
2003-01-10 1:02 bangerth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).