public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Derrick Bass <derrick@caltech.edu>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: target/4244: Explicit template instantiation in library files broken
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030111013603.27723.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR target/4244; it has been noted by GNATS.

>From derrick@caltech.edu  Mon Jan 13 00:55:31 2003
From: Derrick Bass <derrick@caltech.edu>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, derrick@caltech.edu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/4244: Explicit template instantiation in library files broken
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:34:30 -0800

 It appears that you are right. On Mac OS X 10.2.3 this appears to be  
 fixed. gcc -v gives
 Reading specs from /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/3.1/specs
 Thread model: posix
 Apple Computer, Inc. GCC version 1161, based on gcc version 3.1  
 20020420 (prerelease)
 
 Derrick
 
 Begin forwarded message:
 
 > From: bangerth@dealii.org
 > Date: Fri Jan 10, 2003  4:42:31  PM America/Los_Angeles
 > To: derrick@caltech.edu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,  
 > nobody@gcc.gnu.org
 > Subject: Re: target/4244: Explicit template instantiation in library  
 > files broken
 > Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, derrick@caltech.edu,  
 > gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,  
 > gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
 >
 > Synopsis: Explicit template instantiation in library files broken
 >
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: bangerth
 > State-Changed-When: Fri Jan 10 16:42:31 2003
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     It was indicated to me when I had the same problem that this
 >     does not exist any more when OS X is updated to 10.2. It
 >     was thus a bad interplay between gcc2.95 and the systems's
 >     binutils. Do you have any possibility to check whether this
 >     behavior still exists with either a newer compiler or an
 >     updated system?
 >
 >     Thanks
 >       Wolfgang
 >
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 > trail&database=gcc&pr=4244
 >
 


             reply	other threads:[~2003-01-11  1:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-11  1:36 Derrick Bass [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-11  1:47 bangerth
2003-01-11  0:42 bangerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030111013603.27723.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=derrick@caltech.edu \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).