public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/9285: [3.4 regression] False shadowing of parameters in templates
@ 2003-01-15 20:46 Andrew Pollard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pollard @ 2003-01-15 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mmitchel; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/9285; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Andrew Pollard <Andrew.Pollard@brooks-pri.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, wlandry@ucsd.edu,
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/9285: [3.4 regression] False shadowing of parameters in templates
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 20:40:20 +0000
Hi All,
This is probably related to (the fixed) c++/9112 and the recently
submitted c++/9333.
Andrew.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/9285: [3.4 regression] False shadowing of parameters in templates
@ 2003-01-22 17:52 mmitchel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel @ 2003-01-22 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, mmitchel, wlandry
Synopsis: [3.4 regression] False shadowing of parameters in templates
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: mmitchel
State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 22 17:52:21 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed in GCC 3.4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9285
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/9285: [3.4 regression] False shadowing of parameters in templates
@ 2003-01-13 0:09 bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-01-13 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, mmitchel, nobody, wlandry
Old Synopsis: REGRESSION: False shadowing of parameters in templates
New Synopsis: [3.4 regression] False shadowing of parameters in templates
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->mmitchel
Responsible-Changed-By: bangerth
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 12 16:09:04 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Author of the new parser.
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 12 16:09:04 2003
State-Changed-Why:
This is a reduced testcase:
------------------------
struct X{
X(double *data, double d0, double d1);
};
int foo(double d0) {
double * data;
X(data,d0,d0);
}
----------------------------
It compiled with a snapshot from 2002-12-25, but fails now.
Probably due to the new parser.
Present compilers say
regression/test> ../bin/gcc-2003-01-05/bin/c++ -c PR9285.cc
PR9285.cc: In function `int foo(double)':
PR9285.cc:7: error: declaration of `d0' shadows a parameter
PR9285.cc:7: error: no matching function for call to `X::X()'
PR9285.cc:1: error: candidates are: X::X(const X&)
PR9285.cc:2: error: X::X(double*, double, double)
PR9285.cc:7: error: expected init-declarator
PR9285.cc:7: error: expected `,' or `;'
W.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9285
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-22 17:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-15 20:46 c++/9285: [3.4 regression] False shadowing of parameters in templates Andrew Pollard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-22 17:52 mmitchel
2003-01-13 0:09 bangerth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).