public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/9443
@ 2003-01-31 16:16 Wolfgang Bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2003-01-31 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/9443; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/9443
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:14:15 -0600 (CST)
Wow, what a sequence of problems in one little testcase.
Regarding the question of checking in my compiler: It's standard mainline,
so yes, with checking. Unfortunately, the original code does not compile
cleanly to the point of the ICE any more -- there are tons of errors about
the use of numeric_limit, which are caused by a patch by Mark this week,
AFAICT. So I can't really reproduce the tree checking failure any more...
W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-01-31 16:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-31 16:16 c++/9443 Wolfgang Bangerth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).