public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: other/8948: [3.3 regression] Definition of __i686 causes big Problems
@ 2003-02-11 0:21 jbuck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jbuck @ 2003-02-11 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, norbert_wolff
Synopsis: [3.3 regression] Definition of __i686 causes big Problems
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: jbuck
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 11 00:21:58 2003
State-Changed-Why:
This is not a gcc bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8948
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: other/8948: [3.3 regression] Definition of __i686 causes big Problems
@ 2003-01-08 9:46 Volker Reichelt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Volker Reichelt @ 2003-01-08 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR other/8948; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: jbuck@synopsys.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, norbert_wolff@t-online.de
Subject: Re: other/8948: [3.3 regression] Definition of __i686 causes big Problems
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 11:37:08 +0100
On 7 Jan, Joe Buck wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8948
>
> The definition of __i686 has been present in gcc all along; removing it will
> cause other regressions (any code that depends on it will break), so
> that's not an
> option.
>
> Will glibc-2.3.1 build with older gcc's? If so, why isn't there trouble
> from
> sysdep.h in such cases?
>
> Volker, you are calling this a regression, but do older gcc's actually work?
> If so, how? They define __i686 too, in exactly the same way.
I marked it as a regression according to the submitter's remark "so this
library cannot be compiled any more for i686". I didn't actually check,
but the problem sounded severe, so that I marked it as a regresion
anyway, just to be sure that it gets attention.
I should have been more explicit about that, sorry.
Regards,
Volker
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: other/8948: [3.3 regression] Definition of __i686 causes big Problems
@ 2003-01-08 1:56 Joe Buck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joe Buck @ 2003-01-08 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR other/8948; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, norbert_wolff@t-online.de,
reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
Cc:
Subject: Re: other/8948: [3.3 regression] Definition of __i686 causes big
Problems
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 17:51:19 -0800
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8948
The definition of __i686 has been present in gcc all along; removing it will
cause other regressions (any code that depends on it will break), so
that's not an
option.
Will glibc-2.3.1 build with older gcc's? If so, why isn't there trouble
from
sysdep.h in such cases?
Volker, you are calling this a regression, but do older gcc's actually work?
If so, how? They define __i686 too, in exactly the same way.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: other/8948: [3.3 regression] Definition of __i686 causes big Problems
@ 2002-12-16 9:23 reichelt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: reichelt @ 2002-12-16 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, norbert_wolff
Old Synopsis: Definition of __i686 causes big Problems
New Synopsis: [3.3 regression] Definition of __i686 causes big Problems
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: reichelt
State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 16 09:23:47 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Not being able to compile glibc-2.3.1 sounds like a regression.
However, I'm not sure whether this is really a gcc bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8948
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-11 0:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-11 0:21 other/8948: [3.3 regression] Definition of __i686 causes big Problems jbuck
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-08 9:46 Volker Reichelt
2003-01-08 1:56 Joe Buck
2002-12-16 9:23 reichelt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).