Re: libstdc++/8670: Alignment problem in std::basic_string

Re: libstdc++/8670: Alignment problem in std::basic_string

[paolo]

Synopsis: Alignment problem in std::basic_string

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->gdr
Responsible-Changed-By: paolo
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 18 11:17:01 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    Knows well the issue.
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: paolo
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 18 11:17:01 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Hi Gaby. What's the status on this one? Shall we go with
    the 'quick and dirty' solution proposed by Martin? I seem
    to recall, however, that you had in mind something cleaner,
    using __attribute__((__aligned__(__alignof__ ...
    Thanks, Paolo.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8670

Re: libstdc++/8670: Alignment problem in std::basic_string

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/8670; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, jkanze@caicheuvreux.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/8670: Alignment problem in std::basic_string
Date: 18 Feb 2003 13:21:00 +0100

 paolo@gcc.gnu.org writes:
 
 | Synopsis: Alignment problem in std::basic_string
 | 
 | Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->gdr
 | Responsible-Changed-By: paolo
 | Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 18 11:17:01 2003
 | Responsible-Changed-Why:
 |     Knows well the issue.
 | State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 | State-Changed-By: paolo
 | State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 18 11:17:01 2003
 | State-Changed-Why:
 |     Hi Gaby. What's the status on this one? Shall we go with
 |     the 'quick and dirty' solution proposed by Martin? I seem
 |     to recall, however, that you had in mind something cleaner,
 |     using __attribute__((__aligned__(__alignof__ ...
 
 Thanks for the reminder.  I'll resurect the corresponding patch I had
 in mind.  Sorry, I was caught in front-end specific issues and it is
 no joy at all :-]
 
 -- Gaby