public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/9623: [3.3/3.4 regression] named initializer regression
@ 2003-02-18 16:47 jason
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jason @ 2003-02-18 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: V.Haisman, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jason, nobody

Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] named initializer regression

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->jason
Responsible-Changed-By: jason
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 18 16:47:57 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    got it

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9623


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/9623: [3.3/3.4 regression] named initializer regression
@ 2003-02-18 18:43 jason
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jason @ 2003-02-18 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: V.Haisman, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jason

Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] named initializer regression

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: jason
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 18 18:43:21 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    fixed

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9623


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/9623: [3.3/3.4 regression] named initializer regression
@ 2003-02-09 17:46 Craig Rodrigues
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Craig Rodrigues @ 2003-02-09 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c++/9623; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, V.Haisman@sh.cvut.cz
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/9623: [3.3/3.4 regression] named initializer regression
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 12:44:52 -0500

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9623
 
 According to the regression tracker the problem started in October:
 
 : Search converges between 2002-10-11-trunk (#9) and 2002-10-12-trunk (#10).
 
 
 Line-numbered input is:
 ========================================
      1  struct S { int x;  int y; };
      2          S s = { x:1, y:2 };
      3
 
 ========================================
 
 
 Diagnostic output follows, from the last compiler tested:
 input:2: error: too many initializers for `S'
 
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/9623: [3.3/3.4 regression] named initializer regression
@ 2003-02-08  0:30 bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-02-08  0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: V.Haisman, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody

Old Synopsis: struct named initializer regression
New Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] named initializer regression

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Sat Feb  8 00:30:54 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Confirmed. A regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9623


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-18 18:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-18 16:47 c++/9623: [3.3/3.4 regression] named initializer regression jason
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-18 18:43 jason
2003-02-09 17:46 Craig Rodrigues
2003-02-08  0:30 bangerth

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).