public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: optimization/2001: [3.2/3.3 regression] Inordinately long compile times in reload CSE regs
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 23:56:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030311235601.18714.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR optimization/2001; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
	lucier@math.purdue.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/2001: [3.2/3.3 regression] Inordinately long compile
 times in reload CSE regs
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 00:48:54 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2001
 
 Brad, the last time you confirmed this ugly bug is 5 months ago, do you 
 still see this?  If so, maybe this is an Alpha-specific problem?  On my 
 ol' slow K6-2, I get a very reasonable compile time (with -march=i586 
 -fPIC -O2 -fno-math-errno):
 
 Execution times (seconds)
  cfg construction      :   0.09 ( 1%) usr   0.01 ( 3%) sys   0.10 ( 1%) wall
  cfg cleanup           :   0.33 ( 3%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.33 ( 3%) wall
  trivially dead code   :   0.12 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.12 ( 1%) wall
  life analysis         :   0.39 ( 4%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.39 ( 3%) wall
  life info update      :   0.14 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.18 ( 2%) wall
  alias analysis        :   0.14 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.14 ( 1%) wall
  register scan         :   0.06 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.06 ( 1%) wall
  rebuild jump labels   :   0.03 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.03 ( 0%) wall
  preprocessing         :   0.10 ( 1%) usr   0.03 ( 9%) sys   0.13 ( 1%) wall
  lexical analysis      :   0.15 ( 2%) usr   0.07 (21%) sys   0.24 ( 2%) wall
  parser                :   0.64 ( 7%) usr   0.06 (18%) sys   0.90 ( 8%) wall
  expand                :   0.21 ( 2%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.32 ( 3%) wall
  varconst              :   0.02 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.04 ( 0%) wall
  integration           :   0.03 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.06 ( 1%) wall
  jump                  :   0.09 ( 1%) usr   0.01 ( 3%) sys   0.10 ( 1%) wall
  CSE                   :   0.58 ( 6%) usr   0.01 ( 3%) sys   0.60 ( 5%) wall
  global CSE            :   1.54 (16%) usr   0.05 (15%) sys   2.14 (18%) wall
  loop analysis         :   0.02 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.02 ( 0%) wall
  bypass jumps          :   0.24 ( 2%) usr   0.01 ( 3%) sys   0.25 ( 2%) wall
  CSE 2                 :   0.20 ( 2%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.20 ( 2%) wall
  branch prediction     :   0.11 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.11 ( 1%) wall
  flow analysis         :   0.02 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.02 ( 0%) wall
  combiner              :   0.24 ( 2%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.24 ( 2%) wall
  if-conversion         :   0.07 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.22 ( 2%) wall
  regmove               :   0.06 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.06 ( 1%) wall
  local alloc           :   0.20 ( 2%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.20 ( 2%) wall
  global alloc          :   1.35 (14%) usr   0.04 (12%) sys   1.70 (14%) wall
  reload CSE regs       :   0.83 ( 9%) usr   0.02 ( 6%) sys   0.92 ( 8%) wall
  flow 2                :   0.06 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.12 ( 1%) wall
  if-conversion 2       :   0.13 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.13 ( 1%) wall
  peephole 2            :   0.03 ( 0%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.10 ( 1%) wall
  rename registers      :   0.23 ( 2%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.26 ( 2%) wall
  scheduling 2          :   0.55 ( 6%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.58 ( 5%) wall
  reorder blocks        :   0.30 ( 3%) usr   0.01 ( 3%) sys   0.34 ( 3%) wall
  shorten branches      :   0.05 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.06 ( 1%) wall
  final                 :   0.12 ( 1%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.17 ( 1%) wall
  rest of compilation   :   0.16 ( 2%) usr   0.00 ( 0%) sys   0.17 ( 1%) wall
  TOTAL                 :   9.66             0.34            11.80
 
 Greetz
 Steven
 
 


             reply	other threads:[~2003-03-11 23:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-11 23:56 Steven Bosscher [this message]
2003-03-12 19:26 Steven Bosscher
2003-03-16 10:06 Steven Bosscher
2003-03-21 23:06 Steven Bosscher
2003-03-21 23:26 Mark Mitchell
2003-03-22 12:23 paolo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030311235601.18714.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).