Re: optimization/2001: [3.2/3.3 regression] Inordinately long compile times in reload CSE regs

[Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>]

The following reply was made to PR optimization/2001; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
	lucier@math.purdue.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/2001: [3.2/3.3 regression] Inordinately long compile
 times in reload CSE regs
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:19:45 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2001
 
 Brad Lucier wrote:
 > Perhaps you were testing 3.4, where this is fixed?  Or perhaps it requires
 > a large number of registers before gcc screws up.  Here are the times I
 > now get, first for the 3.3 branch, then for 3.4:
 
 Uhm, yes I used 3.4.  I got so many gcc versions around now, picked the 
 wrong one.
 
 For 3.3,  I get:
 at -O0:  TOTAL                 :   4.66             0.24             6.14
 at -O2:  TOTAL                 : 316.67             1.71           329.12
 
 Ouch.
 
 > The patch that fixed this for 3.4 was
 >  
 >        http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-02/msg00742.html
 > 
 > Perhaps it's in the RedHat 3.2 branch, too.
 
 Is that a combination of these two patches?
 http://gcc.gnu.org./ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00858.html
 http://gcc.gnu.org./ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg01254.html
 
 rth mentioned 3 patches, but I can only find these two, and
 one other of which you said it did not apply to your sources.
 
 Any clue why this wasn't backported to 3.3?
 
 Greetz
 Steven