public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: middle-end/8306: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE for bitfield7_y.C in C++ compatibility tests
@ 2003-03-15 12:56 Richard Earnshaw
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Earnshaw @ 2003-03-15 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR middle-end/8306; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
janis187@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: middle-end/8306: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE for bitfield7_y.C
in C++ compatibility tests
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 12:48:22 +0000
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:12:09 +0000, <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > Correction, the "minimal example" no-longer fails, but the full testsuite
> > entry does still fail.
>
> Does that still represent a regression? Mark said that previous compilers
> would have just rejected such code.
>
> Jason
Probably not. The 2.95.3 compiler I have gives:
/work/rearnsha/gnusrc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7.h:3:
sorry, not implemented: bit-fields larger than 64 bits
In file included from /work/rearnsha/gnusrc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/compat
/break/bitfield7_y.C:3:
/work/rearnsha/gnusrc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7.h:2:
in declaration of `U::i'
I don't have 3.0 or 3.1 built to test against.
R.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: middle-end/8306: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE for bitfield7_y.C in C++ compatibility tests
@ 2003-03-14 21:46 Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2003-03-14 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR middle-end/8306; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, janis187@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: middle-end/8306: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE for bitfield7_y.C in
C++ compatibility tests
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 16:28:42 -0500
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:12:09 +0000, <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> Correction, the "minimal example" no-longer fails, but the full testsuite
> entry does still fail.
Does that still represent a regression? Mark said that previous compilers
would have just rejected such code.
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: middle-end/8306: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE for bitfield7_y.C in C++ compatibility tests
@ 2003-01-31 17:16 rearnsha
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha @ 2003-01-31 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR middle-end/8306; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, janis187@us.ibm.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: middle-end/8306: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE for bitfield7_y.C in
C++ compatibility tests
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:12:09 +0000
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8306
Correction, the "minimal example" no-longer fails, but the full
testsuite entry does still fail.
R.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: middle-end/8306: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE for bitfield7_y.C in C++ compatibility tests
@ 2003-01-31 17:16 rearnsha
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha @ 2003-01-31 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR middle-end/8306; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, janis187@us.ibm.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: middle-end/8306: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE for bitfield7_y.C in
C++ compatibility tests
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:09:10 +0000
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8306
I've just tried this again on the ARM with the latest 3.4 compiler and
it works without any problems.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-15 12:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-15 12:56 middle-end/8306: [3.2/3.3 regression] ICE for bitfield7_y.C in C++ compatibility tests Richard Earnshaw
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-14 21:46 Jason Merrill
2003-01-31 17:16 rearnsha
2003-01-31 17:16 rearnsha
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).