Re: c++/10162: Parse error with xscale_be-g++ compiler for code which works well with g++

Re: c++/10162: Parse error with xscale_be-g++ compiler for code which works well with g++

[bangerth]

Synopsis: Parse error with xscale_be-g++ compiler for code which works well with g++

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 20 15:59:09 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Duplicate of 10161

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10162

c++/10162: Parse error with xscale_be-g++ compiler for code which works well with g++

[sriram.subramoney]

>Number:         10162
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       Parse error with xscale_be-g++ compiler for code which works well with g++
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          rejects-legal
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Mar 20 06:46:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Sriram N.S.
>Release:        gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release/MontaVista)
>Organization:
>Environment:

>Description:
Parse error was reported by xscale_be-g++ compiler for a class definition similar to the following. Compilation for the same code using the g++ compiler gets thru' without any error. Whether any compiler option is to be used in this case ??. 

Class S
{
  public:
     int E1(const S &s) const;
     int E2(const S &s) const { return E3(); } 
     ...
}

The compilation results in "parse error before &s"
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: