Re: bootstrap/9992: Building compiler for UDK on SCO OpenServer fails

Re: bootstrap/9992: Building compiler for UDK on SCO OpenServer fails

[bangerth]

Synopsis: Building compiler for UDK on SCO OpenServer fails

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 22 04:28:46 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    The configure line you send seems to indicate that you called
    configure in the same directory as the sources. This is
    recommended against in the installation instructions.
    
    Does changing this to what the instructions recommend
    change anything?
    
    Thanks
      Wolfgang

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9992

Re: bootstrap/9992: Building compiler for UDK on SCO OpenServer fails

[Joerg Stritzinger]

The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/9992; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Joerg Stritzinger <joergs@shaw.ca>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
 joergs@shaw.ca, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bootstrap/9992: Building compiler for UDK on SCO OpenServer fails
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:23:05 -0700

 Hi Wolfgang,
 
 I wasn't clear in my description. I actually ran configure in the top 
 directory of "gcc-3.2.2" and NOT in the source subdirectory "gcc".
 It seems, that the problem occurs during the assember code generation 
 where under some weird circumstances
 the symbols are printed incorrectly (something like ".LB01-." instead of 
 ".LB01"). This happens only consistently in certain functions (i.e. 
 _divdi3 )
 and NOT always. It almost looks like an oversight somewhere in the 
 compiler code that shows up only for this target type.
 
 I hope this helps.
 
 Thanks,
  Joerg
 
 bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
 
 >Synopsis: Building compiler for UDK on SCO OpenServer fails
 >
 >State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 >State-Changed-By: bangerth
 >State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 22 04:28:46 2003
 >State-Changed-Why:
 >    The configure line you send seems to indicate that you called
 >    configure in the same directory as the sources. This is
 >    recommended against in the installation instructions.
 >    
 >    Does changing this to what the instructions recommend
 >    change anything?
 >    
 >    Thanks
 >      Wolfgang
 >
 >http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9992
 >