public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: drow@sources.redhat.com
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: c/9853: [3.2 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 05:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030324040601.12346.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR c/9853; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, mas@magica.systems.caltech.edu,
	gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/9853: [3.2 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 23:02:19 -0500

 On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 02:33:08PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
 > drow@sources.redhat.com writes:
 > 
 > | Old Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
 > | New Synopsis: [3.2 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer
 > | 
 > | Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->drow
 > | Responsible-Changed-By: drow
 > | Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 12 17:15:38 2003
 > | Responsible-Changed-Why:
 > |     I've checked in a fix to 3.3 and 3.4, so I'm changing the
 > |     title.  The testcase from this bug still should be checked
 > |     in; the patch from this bug may be better than mine; and 3.2
 > |     is still unaddressed.
 > 
 > Is there a chance to have your patch backported to 3.2 branch?
 
 Certainly.  I'd already tested the patch on 3.2, so I'm taking this as
 approval (checked in now).
 
 -- 
 Daniel Jacobowitz
 MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


             reply	other threads:[~2003-03-24  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-24  5:46 Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-25 19:59 jbuck
2003-03-14 13:46 Gabriel Dos Reis
2003-03-12 17:15 drow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030324040601.12346.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=drow@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).