public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: optimization/8361: [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression
@ 2003-03-24 15:14 Gerald Pfeifer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2003-03-24 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR optimization/8361; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: optimization/8361: [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time
 performance regression
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:18:53 +0100 (CET)

 I have now tested Mark's fix for PR 8361 and while that does not affect
 non-optimizing performance, the difference for -O3 is noticable.
 
 Below are the results of the 3.3-branch from 03/15 versus 03/24 (without
 explicit --disable-checking):
 
   % \time /files/pfeifer/gcc-3.3-0315/bin/g++ -c generate.ii
        28.50 real        27.57 user         0.75 sys
   % \time /files/pfeifer/gcc-3.3-0324/bin/g++ -c generate.ii
        28.70 real        27.42 user         0.69 sys
 
 No difference for non-optimizing compilation...
 
   % \time /files/pfeifer/gcc-3.3-0315/bin/g++ -O3 -c generate.ii
       109.55 real       105.85 user         3.06 sys
   % \time /files/pfeifer/gcc-3.3-0324/bin/g++ -O3 -c generate.ii
        81.28 real        77.41 user         3.55 sys
 
 ...but a nice speedup for -O3!
 
 Gerald


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: optimization/8361: [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression
@ 2003-05-01 11:36 Andrew Pinski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2003-05-01 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR optimization/8361; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: optimization/8361: [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 07:26:47 -0400

 Is there any way, I can get the non-preprocessed code, because the  
 preprocess code produces errors in the system headers.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=8361
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: optimization/8361: [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression
@ 2003-03-23  9:16 Steven Bosscher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steven Bosscher @ 2003-03-23  9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR optimization/8361; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/8361: [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance
 regression
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 10:10:03 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8361
 
 Janis did some more timing:
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-03/msg01425.html
 
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: optimization/8361: [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression
@ 2003-03-15 14:36 Steven Bosscher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steven Bosscher @ 2003-03-15 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR optimization/8361; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/8361: [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance
 regression
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 15:29:28 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8361
 
 Hi Gerald,
 
 Could you produce compile times for this PR and see how we're doing on 
 3.3 and
 mainline?  Quite a few speedup patches have gone in lately (most notably 
 the GC
 limits patches), so the numbers really are way outdated now...
 
 Greetz
 Steven
 
 
 P.S.  Welcome back ;-)
 
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: optimization/8361: [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression
@ 2003-02-18 14:58 ebotcazou
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou @ 2003-02-18 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, pfeifer

Old Synopsis: [3.3,3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression
New Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: ebotcazou
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 18 14:58:42 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Confirmed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8361


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-01 11:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-24 15:14 optimization/8361: [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression Gerald Pfeifer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-01 11:36 Andrew Pinski
2003-03-23  9:16 Steven Bosscher
2003-03-15 14:36 Steven Bosscher
2003-02-18 14:58 ebotcazou

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).