public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/1936: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and >> operator
@ 2003-03-27 15:46 bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-03-27 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens.Maurer, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, mmitchel
Synopsis: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and >> operator
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 27 15:40:15 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Now fixed on mainline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=1936
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/1936: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and >> operator
@ 2003-01-02 19:16 Mark Mitchell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Mitchell @ 2003-01-02 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mmitchel; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c++/1936; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: "neil@gcc.gnu.org" <neil@gcc.gnu.org>,
"Jens.Maurer@gmx.net" <Jens.Maurer@gmx.net>,
"gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
"gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
"mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org" <mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org>,
"nobody@gcc.gnu.org" <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
"gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: c++/1936: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and
>> operator
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 11:11:11 -0800
--On Wednesday, January 01, 2003 08:16:07 PM +0000 "neil@gcc.gnu.org"
<neil@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> Synopsis: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and >>
> operator
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->mmitchel
> Responsible-Changed-By: neil
> Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jan 1 12:16:06 2003
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> Mark, can I give you this?
Yes, but since it's not a regression I'm not going to worry about it
any time soon.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: c++/1936: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and >> operator
@ 2003-01-01 20:16 neil
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: neil @ 2003-01-01 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens.Maurer, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, mmitchel, nobody
Synopsis: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and >> operator
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->mmitchel
Responsible-Changed-By: neil
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jan 1 12:16:06 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Mark, can I give you this? It's trivial, and should be easy to fix. Compile the following line:
int i = (int()) >> 5;
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=1936
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-27 15:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-27 15:46 c++/1936: [2003-01-01] [New parser bug] pseudo-construction and >> operator bangerth
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-02 19:16 Mark Mitchell
2003-01-01 20:16 neil
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).