public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: java/1111: Order matters for inline candidates
@ 2003-03-27 20:56 neroden
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: neroden @ 2003-03-27 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: apbianco, apbianco, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, java-prs
Synopsis: Order matters for inline candidates
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: neroden
State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 27 20:55:46 2003
State-Changed-Why:
waitin' for feedback
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=1111
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: java/1111: Order matters for inline candidates
@ 2003-05-12 18:27 Dara Hazeghi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dara Hazeghi @ 2003-05-12 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: apbianco; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR java/1111; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: java/1111: Order matters for inline candidates
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 11:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
--- Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 19:08:45 +0100
> To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com>
> CC: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>,
> <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
> <java@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: Old Java PRs
>
> Jeff Sturm writes:
> > On Mon, 12 May 2003, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > > Unless I misunderstand this PR, it is fixed
> by the new inliner (except for
> > > > the bytecode frontend, which still does not
> emit whole functions as
> > > > trees).
> > >
> > > It isn't. The new inliner still will not
> inline functions until they
> > > have been expanded.
> >
> > Unfortunately the PR doesn't include a test case.
>
> >
> > So it looks as though you're right, though I
> could swear I've seen this
> > work before. My understanding of the tree
> inliner is that it does not
> > require expanding the inlined bodies to RTL, but
> I don't remember the
> > details.
>
> Given that I wrote the inliner, I do. :-)
>
> The problem is that binding contours for variables
> are generated when
> the functions are expanded.
>
> Andrew.
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: java/1111: Order matters for inline candidates
@ 2003-05-12 18:19 Dara Hazeghi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dara Hazeghi @ 2003-05-12 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: apbianco; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR java/1111; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: java/1111: Order matters for inline candidates
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 11:05:58 -0700
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-
trail&database=gcc&pr=1111
Andrew Haley confirms that this bug is not fixed (20030512).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: java/1111: Order matters for inline candidates
@ 2003-04-11 12:43 aph
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: aph @ 2003-04-11 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: apbianco, apbianco, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, java-prs
Synopsis: Order matters for inline candidates
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open
State-Changed-By: aph
State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 11 12:43:45 2003
State-Changed-Why:
This requires some considerable reorganization of the front end to fix. Maybe porting Java to tree-ssa will do the job.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=1111
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-12 18:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-27 20:56 java/1111: Order matters for inline candidates neroden
2003-04-11 12:43 aph
2003-05-12 18:19 Dara Hazeghi
2003-05-12 18:27 Dara Hazeghi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).