public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: java/8866: [3.3/3.4 regression] Bug in switch statement code generation -- missing label
@ 2003-04-06  0:16 Steven Bosscher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steven Bosscher @ 2003-04-06  0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR java/8866; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	green@redhat.com, graham.stott@btinternet.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: java/8866: [3.3/3.4 regression] Bug in switch statement code
 generation -- missing label
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 02:08:37 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8866
 
 Graham,
 
 The audit trail says you are working on a fix, but the PR hasn't been
 modified for almost two months now.  Is the fix in already and should
 the PR be closed, or is the fix still WIP?
 
 Greetz
 Steven
 
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: java/8866: [3.3/3.4 regression] Bug in switch statement code generation -- missing label
@ 2003-02-13 23:26 Graham Stott
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Graham Stott @ 2003-02-13 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR java/8866; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Graham Stott <graham.stott@btinternet.com>
To: tromey@gcc.gnu.org,  gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, 
 green@redhat.com,  java-prs@gcc.gnu.org,  nobody@gcc.gnu.org, 
 gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: java/8866: [3.3/3.4 regression] Bug in switch statement code
 generation -- missing label
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 23:20:59 +0000

 Hi Tom,
 
 tromey@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] Bug in switch statement code generation -- missing label
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 > State-Changed-By: tromey
 > State-Changed-When: Thu Feb 13 19:13:11 2003
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     The fix for c/7887 didn't help.
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8866
 > 
 
 FYI info I have a handle on this problem :-)
 
 The problem occurs because we collapse the jumptable into a simple jump but in
 doing so we delete the code label associated with the jumptable.
 
 I'm working on a fix
 
 Graham
 
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: java/8866: [3.3/3.4 regression] Bug in switch statement code generation -- missing label
@ 2003-02-13 19:13 tromey
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tromey @ 2003-02-13 19:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, green, java-prs, nobody

Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] Bug in switch statement code generation -- missing label

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: tromey
State-Changed-When: Thu Feb 13 19:13:11 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    The fix for c/7887 didn't help.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8866


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: java/8866: [3.3/3.4 regression] Bug in switch statement code generation -- missing label
@ 2003-02-11 22:16 Tom Tromey
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2003-02-11 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR java/8866; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, green@redhat.com
Subject: Re: java/8866: [3.3/3.4 regression] Bug in switch statement code generation -- missing label
Date: 11 Feb 2003 14:58:12 -0700

 Steven> This is almost certainly a duplicate of c/7887, which I have tracked
 Steven> down to a bug in crossjumping or cfgcleanup.
 
 Thanks.  I added myself to the CC list for 7887.  That way if it is
 fixed I'll remember to check 8866 as well.
 
 Tom


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: java/8866: [3.3/3.4 regression] Bug in switch statement code generation -- missing label
@ 2003-02-11 22:06 Steven Bosscher
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steven Bosscher @ 2003-02-11 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR java/8866; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	green@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: java/8866: [3.3/3.4 regression] Bug in switch statement code
	generation -- missing label
Date: 11 Feb 2003 23:02:10 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8866
 
 
 This is almost certainly a duplicate of c/7887, which I have tracked
 down to a bug in crossjumping or cfgcleanup.
 
 Greetz
 Steven
 
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-06  0:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-06  0:16 java/8866: [3.3/3.4 regression] Bug in switch statement code generation -- missing label Steven Bosscher
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-13 23:26 Graham Stott
2003-02-13 19:13 tromey
2003-02-11 22:16 Tom Tromey
2003-02-11 22:06 Steven Bosscher

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).