Re: c++/10497: Bug #909 not closed : Spurious error using nested classes in constructor calls

Re: c++/10497: Bug #909 not closed : Spurious error using nested classes in constructor calls

[bangerth]

Synopsis: Bug #909 not closed : Spurious error using nested classes in constructor calls

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 25 15:06:35 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    909 was superceded by 925. 925 was closed since the issue is
    fixed in present mainline (what will become 3.4). I re-verified
    this, so the matter is settled.
    
    W.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10497

Re: c++/10497: Bug #909 not closed : Spurious error using nested classes in constructor calls

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

The following reply was made to PR c++/10497; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: have@ann.jussieu.fr
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/10497: Bug #909 not closed : Spurious error using nested classes in constructor calls
Date: 25 Apr 2003 15:29:46 +0200

 have@ann.jussieu.fr writes:
 
 | >Number:         10497
 | >Category:       c++
 | >Synopsis:       Bug #909 not closed : Spurious error using nested classes in constructor calls
 | >Confidential:   no
 | >Severity:       serious
 | >Priority:       medium
 | >Responsible:    unassigned
 | >State:          open
 | >Class:          sw-bug
 | >Submitter-Id:   net
 | >Arrival-Date:   Fri Apr 25 13:26:00 UTC 2003
 | >Closed-Date:
 | >Last-Modified:
 | >Originator:     have@ann.jussieu.fr
 | >Release:        2.95, 3.0, 3.2, 3.3
 | >Organization:
 | >Environment:
 | Linux
 | >Description:
 | Bug #909 does not seem to be fixed even if it is closed.
 | With g++ > 3.0, the error becomes:
 | " error: type specifier omitted for parameter `Z' "
 
 Did you try mainline a.k.a GCC-3.4 (experimental)?  I think this is a
 problem with the old parser which is trying to parse this
 
 |      A a(A::Nested(i), Z);      // ERROR:  type specifier omitted for parameter
 
 as a function declaration and chocks by the time it encounters 'Z'.
 
 |      A e(A::Nested(i));         // OK
 
 the old parser can correctly parse 'e' as a declaration of a function
 taking an 'A::Nested' and returning an 'A'.
 
 -- Gaby

Re: c++/10497: Bug #909 not closed : Spurious error using nested classes in constructor calls

[Andrew Pinski]

The following reply was made to PR c++/10497; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: have@ann.jussieu.fr
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/10497: Bug #909 not closed : Spurious error using nested classes in constructor calls
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:32:59 -0400

 Look at bug #925: <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=925>.
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski
 

c++/10497: Bug #909 not closed : Spurious error using nested classes in constructor calls

[have]

>Number:         10497
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       Bug #909 not closed : Spurious error using nested classes in constructor calls
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Apr 25 13:26:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     have@ann.jussieu.fr
>Release:        2.95, 3.0, 3.2, 3.3
>Organization:
>Environment:
Linux
>Description:
Bug #909 does not seem to be fixed even if it is closed.
With g++ > 3.0, the error becomes:
" error: type specifier omitted for parameter `Z' "
>How-To-Repeat:
// Just compile this code
 class A {
     public:
         struct Nested { Nested(int i) {} };
         
         A(const Nested &n, int *p=0) { }
 };
 
 class B {
     public:
         B(const A::Nested &n, int *p=0) { }
         B(const A &a, int *p=0) { }
 };
 
 int main(void)
 {   
     int *Z=0;
     int i=1;
     A a(A::Nested(i), Z);      // ERROR:  type specifier omitted for parameter
     A b(A::Nested(int(i)), Z); // ERROR:  type specifier omitted for parameter
     A c(A::Nested((int)i), Z); // OK
     A d(A::Nested(1), Z);      // OK
     A e(A::Nested(i));         // OK
     A f(i, Z);                 // OK
     
     B g(A::Nested(i), Z);      // ERROR:  type specifier omitted for parameter
     B h(i, Z);                 // OK
 }
 
 
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: