Re: c++/10230: [3.4 regression] type `A::B' is not a base type for type `C'

Re: c++/10230: [3.4 regression] type `A::B' is not a base type for type `C'

[Kriang Lerdsuwanakij]

The following reply was made to PR c++/10230; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Kriang Lerdsuwanakij <lerdsuwa@users.sourceforge.net>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org,
        gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, pepeaty@yahoo.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/10230: [3.4 regression] type `A::B' is not a base type for
 type `C'
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 00:15:24 +0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10230
 
 Patch submitted:
 
 	http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-04/msg02005.html
 

Re: c++/10230: [3.4 regression] type `A::B' is not a base type for type `C'

[lerdsuwa]

Synopsis: [3.4 regression] type `A::B' is not a base type for type `C'

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa
State-Changed-When: Sun May 11 10:09:26 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Fixed in the main trunk.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10230

Re: c++/10230: [3.4 regression] type `A::B' is not a base type for type `C'

[lerdsuwa]

Synopsis: [3.4 regression] type `A::B' is not a base type for type `C'

Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->lerdsuwa
Responsible-Changed-By: lerdsuwa
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Apr 17 14:39:08 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
    Will work on a fix.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10230

Re: c++/10230: [3.4 regression] type `A::B' is not a base type for type `C'

[bangerth]

Old Synopsis: type `A::B' is not a base type for type `C'
New Synopsis: [3.4 regression] type `A::B' is not a base type for type `C'

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 26 21:27:32 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    The error message is indeed warranted, although it is
    formulated in such a clumsy way that it's hard to understand
    what exactly is wrong. Here's what icc says:
    g/x> icc -c x.cc
    x.cc(11): error: a nonstatic member reference must be relative to a specific object
        void f(void) { sizeof(A::B::a); }
                                    ^
    
    However, things are worse: present mainline ICEs on this
    code:
    g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4-pre/bin/c++ -c x.cc
    x.cc: In member function `void C::f()':
    x.cc:11: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
    
    This is a regression w.r.t. previous versions.
    
    W.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10230