Re: middle-end/10336: [3.4 regression] ICE with -Wunreachable-code (fwd)

Re: middle-end/10336: [3.4 regression] ICE with -Wunreachable-code (fwd)

[Wolfgang Bangerth]

The following reply was made to PR middle-end/10336; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: middle-end/10336: [3.4 regression] ICE with -Wunreachable-code
 (fwd)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:19:26 -0500 (CDT)

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:04:27 +0200
 From: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it>
 To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>, s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl
 Subject: Re: middle-end/10336: [3.4 regression] ICE with -Wunreachable-code
 
 Hello,
 
 I tried both testcases available in PR/10336 (the original one and the new
 one), but I cannot reproduce the bug with either of this:
 
 $ gcc-3.3 -v
 Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3/specs
 Configured with:
 ../gcc/configure --program-suffix=-3.3 --enable-languages=c,c++
  --enable-threads=posix --enable-shared --enable-checking
 Thread model: posix
 gcc version 3.3 20030421 (prerelease)
 
 $ gcc-3.4 -v
 Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4/specs
 Configured with:
 ../gcc/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --program-suffix=-3.4
  --enable-threads=posix --enable-shared
 Thread model: posix
 gcc version 3.4 20030428 (experimental)
 
 
 I tried both the C and the C++ frontend. Command line was simply
 "gcc -c -Wunreachable-code".
 
 Moreover, the audit trail says that the bug is still present in the C
 frontend for 3.3: in this case, it should be marked as a 3.3 regression as
 well (and probably showstopper for the release, given that it breaks the
 feature with very easy code snippets).
 
 Giovanni Bajo