public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c/1687: [3.3/3.4 regression] Exponential time behavior with -O -finline-functions (compile time regression from 2.95.3)
@ 2003-05-02 10:38 Steven Bosscher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steven Bosscher @ 2003-05-02 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c/1687; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, kcook34@ford.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: c/1687: [3.3/3.4 regression] Exponential time behavior with -O
-finline-functions (compile time regression from 2.95.3)
Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 12:24:34 +0200
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=1687
Proposed a patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-05/msg00179.html
Gr.,
Steven
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: c/1687: [3.3/3.4 regression] Exponential time behavior with -O -finline-functions (compile time regression from 2.95.3)
@ 2003-05-01 23:56 Steven Bosscher
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steven Bosscher @ 2003-05-01 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c/1687; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, kcook34@ford.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: c/1687: [3.3/3.4 regression] Exponential time behavior with -O
-finline-functions (compile time regression from 2.95.3)
Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 01:52:13 +0200
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=1687
This bug exists for at least '+', '-', '&', '|' as operators in the
attached test case, i.e.
int in0 ; int in1 ;
int in2 ; int in3 ;
int in4 ; int in5 ;
int in6 ; int in7 ;
int in8 ; int in9 ;
int in10; int in11;
int in12; int in13;
int in14; int in15;
unsigned long output;
void mux(void)
{
output =
(in0 ? 0x00000001 : 0) + (in1 ? 0x00000002 : 0) ||
(in2 ? 0x00000004 : 0) + (in3 ? 0x00000008 : 0) ||
(in4 ? 0x00000010 : 0) + (in5 ? 0x00000020 : 0) ||
(in6 ? 0x00000040 : 0) + (in7 ? 0x00000080 : 0) ||
(in8 ? 0x00000100 : 0) + (in9 ? 0x00000200 : 0) ||
(in10 ? 0x00000400 : 0) + (in11 ? 0x00000800 : 0) ||
(in12 ? 0x00001000 : 0) + (in13 ? 0x00002000 : 0) ||
(in14 ? 0x00004000 : 0) + (in15 ? 0x00008000 : 0) ;
}
also triggers the bug. But '||' and '&&' do not. Maybe a bug
somewhere in convert?
Greetz
Steven
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-02 10:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-02 10:38 c/1687: [3.3/3.4 regression] Exponential time behavior with -O -finline-functions (compile time regression from 2.95.3) Steven Bosscher
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-01 23:56 Steven Bosscher
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).