public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/2094
@ 2003-05-06  0:26 Wolfgang Bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2003-05-06  0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c++/2094; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2094
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 19:18:08 -0500 (CDT)

 The duplicate message is gone, but ptrmem_cst is still not implemented.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
 
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/2094
@ 2003-05-06  0:36 Wolfgang Bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2003-05-06  0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c++/2094; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2094
Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 19:30:36 -0500 (CDT)

 Here's a small testcase that is somewhat more like our usual ones:
 ---------------------
 struct S {
   int i;
 };
 
 template<int S::*p, typename>
 struct X {
     X ();
     template<typename U> X(const X<p,U> &);
 };
 
 X<&S::i,S> x = X<&S::i,S>();
 ----------------------------
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/2094
@ 2001-04-01  0:00 neil
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: neil @ 2001-04-01  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c++/2094; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: neil@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, togawa@acm.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2094
Date: 26 Feb 2001 07:44:15 -0000

 Synopsis: gcc3.1 emits 'sorry, not implemented: use of `ptrmem_cst' in template type unification'
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 State-Changed-By: neil
 State-Changed-When: Sun Feb 25 23:44:15 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     I'm closing this PR - the error message indicates that the
     GCC team is aware of the issue; thus an extra bug report is
     unnecessary and just lowers the signal to noise ratio of
     GNATS.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2094&database=gcc


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/2094
@ 2001-03-14  3:56 lerdsuwa
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: lerdsuwa @ 2001-03-14  3:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c++/2094; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, togawa@acm.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2094
Date: 14 Mar 2001 11:54:15 -0000

 Synopsis: gcc3.1 emits 'sorry, not implemented: use of `ptrmem_cst' in template type unification'
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa
 State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 14 03:54:15 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     Confirm as a bug.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2094&database=gcc


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-06  0:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-06  0:26 c++/2094 Wolfgang Bangerth
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-06  0:36 c++/2094 Wolfgang Bangerth
2001-04-01  0:00 c++/2094 neil
2001-03-14  3:56 c++/2094 lerdsuwa

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).